Tuesday, May 24, 2011

Co-Founder Of Reaganomics, Paul Craig Roberts, "There Is Probably More Democracy In China Than There Is In The West"

Paul Craig Roberts: "The west prides itself that it is the standard for the world, that it is a democracy. But nowehere do you see democratic outcomes: not in Greece, not in Ireland, not in the UK, not here, the outcomes are always to punish the innocent and reward the guilty. And that's what the Greeks are in the streets, protesting. We see this all over the west. There is no democracy, there are oligarchies, some of these smaller European countries are not even run by their own governments, they are run by Wall Street... There is probably more democracy in China than there is in the west. Revolution is the only answer... We are confronted with a curious situation. Throughout the west we think we have democracy, we hold ourselves up high, we demonize China, we talk about the mafia state of Russia, we talk about the Arabs and so on, but where is the democracy here?"


David Stockman "A Technical Default (on U.S. Debt) Is a Virtual Certainty"


Submitted by: Francis Soyer 5/24/11

Who is David Stockman? He is the former budget director for Ronald Reagan, affiliated with neither party and has seen and predicted the current fiscal mess that exists years ago and has been more vocal lately as we approach financial Armageddon.

He has some salient points listed below in addition to the very basic fact that the U.S. Treasury has to borrow $6 Billion per day just to prevent checks from bouncing. Video below

"I don't have any hope they'll come to a substantive agreement on the big things that need to be done because both parties have ruled off the table the essential things that are necessary.”


Monday, May 23, 2011

Barney Frank: U.S. government default likely

U.S. Rep. Barney Frank (D-Newton) says America might have to default on its bills for the first time ever because Democrats and Republicans can’t agree to raise the government’s $14.3 trillion debt ceiling.




“I’m pessimistic about anything reasonable (winning congressional approval) in the near term,” Frank, the ranking Democrat on the House Financial Services Committee, told the New England Council in a Boston speech today. “It may be that we’re going to have to see some failure to raise the debt limit and some temporary hiatus in our ability to pay our bills (for lawmakers to act).”



The U.S. government officially hit its congressionally mandated debt ceiling on Monday when the nation’s red ink reached $14.3 trillion

Thursday, May 19, 2011

Oh I Get it Now! The REAL REASON our Soldgiers are In HARMS Way IN AFGHANISTAN

WAKE UP AMERICA! WAKE THE FUCK UP!

Turn off the fucking TV, Stop Watching Dancing with The Stars and Take a LOOK at How Fucking Curropt our GOVERNMENT IS!

A team of JP FUCKING MORGAN bankers starts to tap the country's vast mineral riches, with help from the Pentagon.
By James Bandler, editor-at-large

FORTUNE -- Qara Zaghan, Afghanistan: The four Black Hawk helicopters sweep down on this remote river valley, flying fast and single file. Snow covers the mountains' peaks, but the lower slopes look like rust -- dry, rocky, and bare. As we bank around the river bend, we see our first flash of green in the fields below and then the rectangular mud huts of the village, where hundreds of Afghans mass to greet us.
"That's the mine over there," one of my companions says, pointing to the cliffs rising above the village.
That's it? That's the gold mine? It doesn't look all that different from the forbidding country we've been traversing: just another pile of rocks and scree. The jet-lagged man in the seat across from me knows better. His sleepy eyes are suddenly alert. If anyone can wrest a fortune from Afghanistan's rubble, it is this man, Ian Hannam.
Arriving in a developing nation with his iPad and his enigmatic smile, Hannam personifies the soft side of Western power. He doesn't bend people to his will with weapons or threats. But there is no mistaking the dealmaker's impact: In his wake, mountains are razed, villages electrified, schools built, and fortunes made.
To Hannam, chairman of J.P. Morgan Capital Markets, Afghanistan represents a gigantic, untapped opportunity -- one of the last great natural-resource frontiers. Landlocked and pinioned by imperial invaders, Afghanistan has been cursed by its geography for thousands of years. Now, for the first time, Hannam believes, that geography could be an asset. The two most resource-starved nations on the planet, China and India, sit next door to Afghanistan, where, according to Pentagon estimates, minerals worth nearly $1 trillion lie buried. True, there is a war under way. And it's unclear how the death of Osama bin Laden will impact the country's political and economic environment. But Hannam is not your usual investment banker: A former soldier, he has done business in plenty of strife-torn countries. So have all the members of his team, two of them former special forces soldiers who have fought here.



Attending the ribbon cutting were (from left) mine owner Sadat Naderi; Mining Minister Wahidullah Shahrani; J.P. Morgan's Ian Hannam; and (behind Hannam) investor Pairoj Piempongsant.
As he flies to the mine for the ribbon-cutting ceremony, Hannam thinks back over the past 12 months. This little mine, where operations have yet to commence, is puny by J.P. Morgan's (JPM) standards, but he knows it might be the project for which he is remembered. A lot of powerful people, including the commander of U.S. forces in Afghanistan, Gen. David Petraeus, are counting on him to demonstrate that the country is safe for foreign investors. Hannam has chafed at times under the pressure from the Pentagon, and the cold-eyed realist in him wonders whether unrealistic expectations are being placed on this business venture.
Hannam ducks his head and climbs out of the chopper, necktie flapping in the prop wash. As he trudges up the hill, even the jaded, 55-year-old banker seems swept away by the pageantry of the moment: the village elder in a ceremonial robe, the silhouettes of women watching from the ridges, the saluting Afghan soldier. Hannam is enveloped in a crush of local tribesmen chattering excitedly in Dari. One of them puts a garland around his neck. Another hands him a Ziploc bag containing a chunk of Afghan gold. A mullah utters prayers. Afghanistan's minister of mining gives a long speech.
Hannam and his local partner, Sadat Naderi, walk up the hill to pose for photographs. Naderi points to a narrow band of quartz that runs in an east-west line across the cliff side. It shimmers in the sun. That is the treasure, he says.
"Unless," Hannam mutters, "it's fool's gold."
Absurd risks vs. amazing rewards
Investing in conflict zones is often thrilling, but the great commodities rush that J.P. Morgan and the Pentagon are trying to spark in Afghanistan creates a risk/reward equation of a different magnitude. It's extreme at both ends.
When J.P. Morgan launched its Afghan initiative in 2010, violence was at its worst since the American-led occupation began in 2001. The Taliban have made a point of killing Westerners and have specifically said they would attack any companies involved in mining. Before our trip to the mine was done, our group would get a taste of the insurgents' ability to strike violently and unpredictably.
Then there's the Afghan infrastructure -- or rather, there isn't. Big mines need power, lots of it. Outside of cities, only 15% of Afghanistan is electrified. The mountain roads -- ungraded and often without guardrails -- are perilous, I learned the hard way, particularly in winter. Seat belts? No one bothers. You crash, you die.
If the brutal war and roads don't give a businessperson pause, the country's governance and corruption problems should. Massive fraud marred recent elections. Transparency International rates Afghanistan as the second most corrupt country on earth after Somalia. The last minister of mining was identified in a Washington Post report as the recipient of a massive bribe, an allegation he denied to Fortune. The current minister, who had been widely described as an honest reformer, has recently had his integrity questioned in State Department cables released by WikiLeaks. He, too, told Fortune he has done nothing improper.
But if the risks are absurd, the potential rewards are off the charts. Hundreds of billions of dollars' worth of iron, copper, rare earth metals, and, yes, gold are buried beneath Afghanistan's deserts and mountains. This wealth has lain there mainly undisturbed for thousands of years as armies of Persians, Greeks, Mongols, Britons, Russians, and now Americans tramped above. Invaders have dreamed of exploiting it since the time of Alexander the Great, but no one has yet succeeded on a large scale.

A Chinese company is trying to start a copper operation in strife-torn Logar province, but actual mining is years away.
In an 1841 article in a journal of Asiatic studies, Capt. Henry Drummond, a member of the British 3rd Bengal Light Cavalry, described his rambles through the wildest parts of Afghanistan to conduct the first Western mineral survey of the country. He found "abundant green stains" of copper, some of which rivaled the deposits of Chile, and veins of iron ore that "might no doubt be obtained equal to the Swedish." While many of his countrymen viewed Afghanistan as an untamable place, where a man could not stray many yards from his home or tent without risk of being murdered, Drummond was smitten. Mining, he felt -- not the gun -- offered the best hope to pacify the territory and win over Afghans.
"Give them, however, but constant employment, with good wages and regular payment; encourage a spirit of industry, both by precept and example; let strict justice be dealt out to them without respect of persons; and we shall shortly see their swords changed into plowshares, industry take place of licentiousness, and these people be converted into peaceable and useful subjects," Drummond wrote. But the Afghans weren't keen on the idea of handing over their minerals to occupiers, or on the British occupation itself, for that matter. A year later they massacred the entire British army, save one English survivor, at Gandamak.
During the Cold War, both Soviet and U.S. geologists conducted surveys. The Russians bored thousands of test holes and identified big deposits of copper, zinc, mercury, tin, fluorite, potash, talc, asbestos, and magnesium. But instability in the countryside put an end to serious mining exploration.
After the toppling of the Taliban by the U.S.-led coalition, the Afghan government, with financial assistance from the U.S. Agency for International Development, commissioned new, high-tech aerial surveys of Afghanistan. The results were stunning: The U.S. Geological Survey identified huge veins of copper, iron, lithium, gold, and silver. The Afghan government solicited bids for one of the biggest of the copper deposits, a site south of Kabul that had been identified by both Drummond and the Soviets. China, offering a rich price, won the bid in 2007, beating out four other mining companies. But the Chinese mining company has yet to extract any copper from the site because of delays clearing land mines from the area, and the discovery of archeological relics.
Then, in 2009, mining in Afghanistan got the push it needed -- from the U.S. military. Petraeus had been appointed commander of U.S. Central Command, which had ultimate authority over Afghanistan. He realized that a U.S. exit from Afghanistan depended on getting the country's economy running. Up to 60% of Afghanistan's $15 billion GDP comes from foreign aid, according to Pentagon estimates, and another 20% comes from the illicit drug trade -- poppies. What Afghanistan needed was the real hope that it might achieve economic sovereignty. "I'm an old economist," the general says in an interview at his headquarters in Kabul. "And at the end of the day this is about progress for the [Afghan] people and giving them the prospect for a much brighter future for them and their families. That's what persuades the citizenry to support the government rather than support the Taliban."
Realizing that conventional foreign-aid organizations weren't getting the job done, Petraeus moved a crack economic stabilization team from Iraq into Afghanistan. That team quickly realized that mining would be key.
Enter Ian Hannam.
"This is the time in Afghanistan for the adventure venture capitalists -- for those who can do business in tough places in the world," Petraeus says.
From special forces to making billionaires

Villagers at Qara Zaghan hope mining will bring jobs, electricity, schools, and a health clinic.
Ian Charles Hannam seemed bound for a swashbuckling career at an early age. Raised in a working-class neighborhood in South London, the son of a council worker who oversaw a housing and street-repair crew, Hannam grew up knowing that nothing would ever be handed to him. He joined the Territorial Special Air Service at age 17, one of the younger men to pass the service's grueling selection process.
Hannam's unit, the Artists Rifles, was a part-time regiment akin to a U.S. National Guard special forces unit. The Artists Rifles had a storied past and a reputation for attracting adventure seekers from all social classes. Since then, Hannam has counted his old SAS cronies as his closest friends, often calling on them to help him in the world's tougher places.
While serving in the Artists Rifles, Hannam pursued a degree in civil engineering from England's top school in that field, Imperial College. Upon graduation in 1977, he took a job with Taylor Woodrow, a large British construction firm. His first assignment was to build roads, radar stations, and airstrips in Oman for the SAS, which was in the final stages of crushing a Marxist-led insurgency that had been boiling in the Dhofar region for more than a decade. The experience convinced Hannam that revolts could be beaten with a counterinsurgency program that emphasized developing a country's infrastructure and natural resources.
Still working for Taylor Woodrow, Hannam went to Nigeria and then back to Oman. Living in a tent, he could not help noticing how well oil-company executives lived. That's when he decided to go to business school and become rich.
After graduating from the London Business School, Hannam got a job in 1984 in the training program at Salomon Brothers in New York. At the airport on his way home to London for Christmas that year, he was detained by immigration officials because he had no U.S. entry stamp on his passport. The reason: He had parachuted into the U.S. with an SAS unit that was training with American special forces, and then traveled to New York to start the training program.
With a work ethic that former colleagues describe as ferocious and an engineer's taste for understanding complex financial mechanisms, Hannam was fast-tracked to the bank's vaunted debt syndicate desk. "His embrace of complexity and change, his indifference to organizational hierarchy and abundant self-confidence born of experience set him apart," recalls Terry Fitzgerald, founder of Longbow Capital Partners, who was at Salomon with Hannam.
When Salomon was hired to advise media baron Robert Maxwell's Mirror Group during its public offering, Hannam was one of Salomon's lead bankers charged with marketing the IPO. Salomon lost money on the deal. Months later Maxwell died and Mirror Group collapsed amid investigations into accounting fraud and raids on its pension fund.
Hannam left Salomon soon after the fiasco and was hired by merchant bank Robert Fleming, a Scottish firm founded by the grandfather of James Bond creator Ian Fleming. By 2000, Hannam was the highest-paid employee at Fleming, making more than the CEO. After the bank was acquired by J.P. Morgan, much of Fleming's staff was laid off. Not Hannam. He helped engineer a joint venture with, and eventual takeover of, venerated British banking house Cazenove.
Among the old guard at Cazenove -- which was subsumed by J.P. Morgan, though the British franchise still bears its name -- Hannam was regarded as a bit of a barbarian. He bragged about his wealth. He had appalling table manners. "I've got more degrees than I can count, but I still talk like I'm illiterate, and my colleagues hate me for it," he'd say.
From Congo to Colombia, from Iraq to Sierra Leone, Hannam and his small team of soldiers-turned-bankers and advisers did business with oligarchs, gem dealers, and former mercenaries. He could be bracingly direct. When he landed in Baghdad for a meeting with Iraq's oil minister, the minister asked, "What are you here for?"
"I'm here to make five new Iraqi billionaires every year for the next 10 years," Hannam said with a twinkle in his eyes. It was an effective icebreaker, recalled his friend Richard Williams, a former SAS commander who is now CEO of the Afghan gold mine. "They're all thinking, 'How can I be one of those?' Which is not a question that a minister should be thinking." However crude, Hannam's point -- it would be Iraqis, not Westerners, who were getting rich -- worked.

At an emerald mine high above the Panjshir Valley, work is done by kerosene lantern.
Over the years Hannam had starring roles in a string of huge deals, including the combination of BHP and Billiton (BHP) and its listing on the London exchange, the creation of mining group Xstrata, and the formation of Kazakh commodities giant Kazakhmys. In 2007, Hannam's appetite for risk and intrigue nearly sank him. A group of Omani investors had hired him to explore the possibility of a leveraged buyout and breakup of Dow Chemical. Hannam and another top J.P. Morgan executive held clandestine meetings with two Dow Chemical executives at the Compleat Angler, a luxury hotel on the bank of the Thames.
The only problem: Dow's CEO had no idea that the meeting was taking place. The scandal attracted front-page notice around the world.
In 2008, Hannam was passed over for the top job at Cazenove in favor of an outsider. Hannam flew to New Zealand for two weeks, turned off the phone, and brooded. But he decided to stay at the bank, and soon he was doing multibillion-dollar deals again, including lead work on the recapitalization of HSBC. With a job that paid bonuses as high as 10 million pounds, Hannam had come a long way from his boyhood in Bermondsey. He had a wife and three children, a townhouse in Notting Hill, a wild game preserve in the Stormberg mountains of South Africa, and a 230-acre estate in Vermont. But the council worker's son was hungry for something bigger.
In 2009, at a dinner in Baghdad, he met the man who would give him his chance. The name of their meeting place was fitting for a rendezvous that would help touch off a 21st-century version of the Great Game: the Baghdad Hunting Club.
Hannam was at the banquet hall for a reception thrown by the Trade Bank of Iraq to honor J.P. Morgan. Also at the reception was Paul Brinkley, a deputy under secretary of defense charged with jump-starting Iraq's stalled economy. A former tech company executive, Brinkley served as a matchmaker of sorts between Iraqi entrepreneurs and foreign businessmen. With the blessing of Defense Secretary Robert Gates, he operated outside normal bureaucratic channels, eschewing the bulletproof vests and helmets his civilian colleagues wore in combat zones. In three years he had secured some $8 billion in private investment contracts for Iraq, helping start textile mills, cement factories, and electronics companies. Hannam and Brinkley had heard about each other's work. J.P. Morgan had been one of the first Western companies to plant the flag in Iraq, overseeing the country's currency and setting up a big oil project in Iraqi Kurdistan. Hannam and Brinkley fell into conversation about Afghanistan, which was to be Brinkley's next posting.
"I've got a problem in Afghanistan," Hannam remembers Brinkley saying. Brinkley was talking to the right man.

China PBOC: New IMF Leadership Should Reflect New World Order


Comment by: Francis Soyer

In a language that everyone can understand what the article below is about is the following. China as confirmed by wickileaks in anticipating the new monetary system a year or so from now that WILL be GOLD and SIlVER backed is sending the message that as probably the LARGEST holder of Gold and Silver will INSIST on having the LARGEST voting power at the IMF. Is a case of "he who has the gold makes the rules" type of thing...

Thursday, May 19, 2011 - 07:54


China PBOC: New IMF Leadership Should Reflect New World Order

BEIJING (MNI) - The new IMF leadership needs to reflect changes in the world economic order and be more representative of emerging market economies, Chinese central bank governor Zhou Xiaochuan said Thursday in his first public comments since the arrest of Dominique Strauss-Kahn.
"The senior management team of the IMF should better reflect changes in world economic patterns and should be more representative of emerging market economies," he said.
Zhou also said he regretted Strauss-Kahn's decision to resign as the Managing Director of IMF.
"The current world economy is recovering slowly from the financial crisis and the European sovereign debt crisis is at a key stage. A powerful IMF support is needed to overcome current difficulties facing Europe and ensure world economic developments are on a robust, sustainable and balanced track," Zhou added.
German Chancellor Angela Merkel reiterated earlier today that the next head of the International Monetary Fund should be a European again.
beijing@marketnews.com ** Market News International Beijing Newsroom: 86-10-5864-5274 **

Wednesday, May 18, 2011

Another Presentation on What The Federal Reserve Is and How It Came to Be


Submitted by: Francis Soyer 5/18/11

Lets review! After talking with some friends and colleagues some of whom work as professionals in the Financial Services industry specifically Investment Management it is clear to me that some are still confused about what the Federal Reserve Bank is, it's purpose and how it came to be. Rather than waste your time and mine in that I am not a teacher by profession here is a video lecture from a man named Michael Badnarik who explains things much more elegantly and to the point than I can.

World Bank sees end to dollar’s hegemony

By James Politi in Washington Financial Times

Published: May 17 2011 18:41 | Last updated: May 17 2011 18:41

The World Bank expects the US dollar to lose its solitary dominance in the global economy by 2025, as the euro and the renminbi establish themselves on an equal footing in a new “multi-currency” monetary system.

The shift will be driven by the increasing power and strength of emerging market economies, with six countries – Brazil, China, India, Indonesia, Russia and South Korea – accounting for more than half of global growth in 14 years.

According to the World Bank report – released on Tuesday – emerging economies will grow at a rate of 4.7 per cent between now and 2025, a much faster pace than advanced economies which are expected to grow by 2.3 per cent over the same time-frame.
“The balance of global growth and investment will shift to developing or emerging economies,” said Mansoor Dailami, the lead author of the report.

The implications are wide-ranging. For instance, Mr Dailami said this power shift would lead to big boosts in investment flows to the countries driving global growth, with a significant increase in cross-border mergers and acquisitions activity, and a changing corporate landscape in which “you’re not going to see the dominance of established multinationals”.

In addition, a different international monetary system will gradually evolve, wiping out the US dollar’s position as the world’s main reserve currency.

“The current predominance of the US dollar would end sometime before 2025 and would be replaced by a monetary system in which the dollar, the euro and the renminbi would each serve as full-fledge international currencies,” the report said, highlighting what it considered the “most likely” of three scenarios for the currency markets in 15 years.

The report identified the euro as the most “credible” rival to the US dollar, with one caveat. “Its status is poised to expand, provided the euro can successfully overcome the sovereign debt crises currently faced by several of its member countries and can avoid the moral hazard problems associated with bail-outs of countries within the European Union,” the report said.

On China, the report noted that authorities there had already started “internationalising” the renminbi by developing an offshore market in the currency and encouraging the use of the renminbi in settling and invoicing international trade transactions.

“A larger role for the renminbi would help resolve the disparity between China’s great economic strength on the global stage and its heavy reliance on foreign currencies,” the report said.
The scenario presented by the World Bank means that financial institutions will have to “adapt fast to keep up,” said Justin Yifu Lin, the group’s chief economist.

Ex-Sen. Feingold says Lieberman, McCaskill, Hoyer fit for 'shame'

Ex-Sen. Feingold says Lieberman, McCaskill, Hoyer fit for 'shame'


By Michael O'Brien - 05/17/11 12:03 PM ET


Former Sen. Russ Feingold (D-Wis.) has tabbed two Democrats and Independent Sen. Joe Lieberman (Conn.) as fit for "shame" for being too beholden to corporate interests.


Feingold, the former liberal senator who leads a new PAC called Progressives United, singled out House Minority Whip Steny Hoyer (D-Md.), Sen. Claire McCaskill (D-Mo.) and Lieberman (Conn.), an independent who caucuses with Democrats, for a close relationship with corporations.


"This culture of corporate influence and corruption is precisely what we at Progressives United want to change. So we've decided to take on those legislators who are unwilling to stand up to corporate power, and we're naming names," Feingold wrote in an email, asking for $5 donations to "shame" those lawmakers with online ads.

1 Kilo Gold Futures Start Trading On Hong Kong Merc

1 Kilo Gold Futures Start Trading On Hong Kong Merc


Submitted by Tyler Durden on 05/17/2011 20:48 -0400
Hong KongPrecious Metals


As of 8 pm Eastern, the Comex' monopoly to the precious metals futures is over. As we reported previously, today, at 8 am local time, is when the Hong Kong Mercantile exchange would start trading the inaugural Asian precious metal futures contract: the 32 ounce /1 kilo/ gold futures. In the first 30 minutes of trading it appears to have been a subdued session, with just 22 contracts changing hands in the August 2011-June 2012 frame. How this trading will impact prices: nobody knows (yet). The spot price of gold has barely budged in the past hour. That said, now that PM futures fragmentation is starting, we expect that within 2 years we will have various deranged HFT algos trading tonnes of gold, quote stuffing globally, and otherwise creating one of the most volatile trading environments imaginable.

And since we know you are asking: the margin schedule for the HKMerx will be kept and listed by the same LCH.Clearnet that hikes and lowers Irish and Portuguese bond margins by 10% on an almost weekly basis. Let see now how the Comex hikes its gold margins with impunity if it has competition that keeps margins "artificially" low, and provides disgruntled Comex clients with an alternative venue that accepts far less cash collateral to trade.

It's called competition Chicago: get used to it.

Monday, May 16, 2011

Why no Wall St. bigwig has been prosecuted

By Roger Lowenstein


Business Week

updated 5/15/2011 12:17:42 PM ET 2011-05-15T16:17:42

Share Print Font: +-"Forgive me," began Charles Ferguson, the director of Inside Job, while accepting his 2011 Oscar for Best Documentary. "I must start by pointing out that three years after a horrific financial crisis caused by massive fraud, not a single financial executive has gone to jail, and that's wrong." The audience erupted in applause.


Ferguson is not the first to express outrage over the lack of criminal cases to spring from the financial crisis, and his speech triggered a wave of similarly prosecutorial sentiments. Since that February night, financial journalists, bloggers, and who knows how many dinner party guests have debated the trillion-dollar question: When will a Wall Street executive be sent to jail?


There are those who have implied that prosecutors are either too cozy with Wall Street or too incompetent to bring cases to court. Thus, in a measured piece that assessed the guilt of various financial executives, New York Times columnist Joe Nocera lamented that "Wall Street bigwigs whose firms took unconscionable risks … aren't even on Justice's radar screen." A news story in the Times about a mortgage executive who was convicted of criminal fraud observed, "The Justice Dept. has yet to bring charges against an executive who ran a major Wall Street firm leading up to the disaster." In the same dispassionate tone, National Public Radio's All Things Considered chimed in, "Some of the most publicly reviled figures in the mortgage mess won't face any public accounting." New York magazine saw fit to print the estimable opinion of Bernie Madoff, who observed that the dearth of criminal convictions is "unbelievable." Rolling Stone, which has been beating this drum the longest and with the heaviest hand, reductively asked, "Why isn't Wall Street in jail?"

PIMCO's Largest "Equity" Holding - Gold

Many have been wondering why Bill Gross, with his atavistic aversion to holding US paper, has not yet branched out into precious metals which are the natural hedge to surging rates (not to mention sovereign default). Probably the primary reason for this is that the firm's flagship credit funds do not have the mandate, nor permission, to invest in such asset classes. As such, the firm's $200+ billion TRF flagship fund, at least, is limited to fixed income securities. However, the same limitation does not apply to the firm's other funds, especially the recently launched $1.2 billion equity fund, the Pimco EqS Pathfinder. The fund was launched in 2009 under the stewardship of Anne Gudefin and Charles Lahr, who jointly ran the $16 billion Mutual Global Discover mutual fund. So in an interview recently granted to Fortune by Gudefin, we were not very surprised to hear her response on what her largest investment position is in: "The largest position in the fund is gold, which we think is a very good form of protection against what can go wrong. We were encouraged by the fact that a lot of the central banks, especially in Asia, are big buyers. We think that's an underlying trend that's very favorable for gold." So to all those asking why Gross does not invest in the yellow metal, here is your answer.Should the EqS Pathfinder fund grow in AUM, one can assume that an increasingly bigger pro rata portion will be allocated to precious metals.

WPI Students Flip the Bird to CEO of Exxon Mobile Rex Tillerson

Comment by: Francis Soyer 5/16/11
Here is an example of why WPI is ranked as one of the top engineering schools in the world. Looks like they are getting a good education on not just how things work but WHY things work they way they do. Bravo and hats off to the WPI clan!

See article below:

Peak Oil: A Chance to Change the World
For advice about life after graduation, students at Worcester Polytechnic wanted to hear from peak oil scholar Richard Heinberg instead of Exxon's CEO. Here's what he told them.
by
Oil protest, photo by schoCreative
Photo by schoCreative
Worcester Polytechnic Institute in Worcester, MA invited Rex Tillerson, CEO of ExxonMobil, to give the commencement speech at its 2011 graduation ceremonies on May 14. When students heard this, many were surprised and upset. As Linnea Palmer Paton of Students for a Just and Stable Future put it in a letter to the college president, “[W]e, as conscientious members of the WPI community and proud members of the Class of 2011, will not give [the Exxon CEO] the honor of imparting ... his well-wishes ... for our futures ... when he is largely responsible for undermining them.”
The students then invited Richard Heinberg, Senior Fellow of Post Carbon Institute, to give an alternative commencement speech. After a few days of negotiations, the college administration agreed to give Heinberg the podium immediately after the main ceremony. Many students chose to walk out during Tillerson’s address. This is what Richard Heinberg had to say.

"We will not give the Exxon CEO the honor of imparting his well-wishes for our futures when he is largely responsible for undermining them.”
-Linnea Palmer Paton,
WPI student
ExxonMobil is inviting you to take your place in a fossil-fueled twenty-first century. But I would argue that Exxon’s vision of the future is actually just a forward projection from our collective rear-view mirror. Despite its high-tech gadgetry, the oil industry is a relic of the days of the Beverly Hillbillies. The fossil-fueled sitcom of a world that we all find ourselves still trapped within may, on the surface, appear to be characterized by smiley-faced happy motoring, but at its core it is monstrous and grotesque. It is a zombie energy economy.
Of course, we all use petroleum and natural gas in countless ways and on a daily basis. These are amazing substances—they are energy-dense and chemically useful, and they yield enormous economic benefit. America started out with vast reserves of oil and gas, and these fuels helped make our nation the richest and most powerful in the world.

The End of the Cheap Oil Economy

But oil and gas are finite resources, so it was clear from the start that, as we extracted and burned them, we were in effect stealing from the future. In the early days, the quantities of fuel available seemed so enormous that depletion posed only a theoretical limit to consumption. We knew we would eventually empty the tanks of Earth’s hydrocarbon reserves, but that was a problem for our great-great-grandkids to worry about.
Yet U.S. oil production has been declining since 1970, even with huge discoveries in Alaska and the Gulf of Mexico. Other countries are also seeing falling rates of discovery and extraction, and world crude oil production has been flat-lined for the past six years, even as oil prices have soared. According to the International Energy Agency, world crude oil production peaked in 2006 and will taper off from now on.
ExxonMobil says this is nothing we should worry about, as there are still vast untapped hydrocarbon reserves all over the world. That’s true. But we have already harvested the low-hanging fruit of our oil and gas endowment. The resources that remain are of lower quality and are located in places that are harder to access than was the case for oil and gas in decades past. Oil and gas companies are increasingly operating in ultra-deep water, or in arctic regions, and need to use sophisticated technologies like hydrofracturing, horizontal drilling, and water or nitrogen injection. We have entered the era of extreme hydrocarbons.
This means that production costs will continue to escalate year after year. Even if we get rid of oil market speculators, the price of oil will keep ratcheting up anyway. And we know from recent economic history that soaring energy prices cause the economy to wither: when consumers have to spend much more on gasoline, they have less to spend on everything else.
But if investment costs for oil and gas exploration and extraction are increasing rapidly, the environmental costs of these fuels are ballooning just as quickly. With the industry operating at the limits of its technical know-how, mistakes can and will happen. As we saw in the Gulf of Mexico in the summer of 2010, mistakes that occur under a mile or two of ocean water can have devastating consequences for an entire ecosystem, and for people who depend on ecosystem services. The citizens of the Gulf coast are showing a brave face to the world and understandably want to believe their seafood industry is safe and recovering, but biologists who work there tell us that oil from the Deepwater Horizon disaster is still working its way up the food chain.
Never mind starving polar bears—we’re facing the prospect of starving people.
Of course the biggest environmental cost from burning fossil fuels comes from our chemical alteration of the planetary atmosphere. Carbon dioxide from oil, gas, and coal combustion is changing Earth’s climate and causing our oceans to acidify. The likely consequences are truly horrifying: rising seas, extreme weather, falling agricultural output, and collapsing oceanic food chains. Never mind starving polar bears—we’re facing the prospect of starving people.

The Misinformation Machine

But wait: Is this even happening? A total of nearly half of all Americans tell pollsters they think either the planet isn’t warming at all, or, if it is, it’s not because of fossil fuels. After all, how can the world really be getting hotter when we’re seeing record snowfalls in many places? And even if it is warming, how do we know that’s not because of volcanoes, or natural climate variation, or cow farts, or because the Sun is getting hotter? Americans are understandably confused by questions like these, which they hear repeated again and again on radio and television.
Now of course, if you apply the critical thinking skills that you’ve learned here at WPI to an examination of the relevant data, you’ll probably come to the same conclusion as has been reached by the overwhelming majority of scientists who have studied all of these questions in great depth. Indeed, the scientific community is nearly unanimous in assessing that the Earth is warming, and that the only credible explanation for this is rising levels of CO2 from the burning of fossil fuels. That kind of consensus is hard to achieve among scientists except in situations where a conclusion is overwhelmingly supported by evidence.
I’m not out to demonize ExxonMobil, but some things have to be said. That company plays a pivotal role in shaping our national conversation about climate change. A 2007 report from the Union of Concerned Scientists described how ExxonMobil adopted the tobacco industry’s disinformation tactics, and funded some of the same organizations that led campaigns against tobacco regulation in the 1980s—but this time to cloud public understanding of climate change science and delay action on the issue. According to the report, between 1998 and 2005 ExxonMobil funneled almost $16 million to a network of 43 advocacy organizations that misrepresented peer-reviewed scientific findings about global warming science. Exxon raised doubts about even the most indisputable scientific evidence, attempted to portray its opposition to action as a positive quest for “sound science” rather than business self-interest, and used its access to the Bush administration to block federal policies and shape government communications on global warming. All of this is well-documented.
This is a big victory for ExxonMobil, but it is a disaster for democracy, for the Earth, and for your generation.
And it worked. Over the course of the past few years one of our nation’s two main political parties has made climate change denial a litmus test for its candidates, which means that climate legislation is effectively unachievable in this country for the foreseeable future. This is a big victory for ExxonMobil. Its paltry $16 million investment will likely translate to many times that amount in unregulated profits. But it is a disaster for democracy, for the Earth, and for your generation.
But here’s the thing. Everyone knows that America and the world will have to transition off of fossil fuels during this century anyway. Mr. Tillerson knows it as well as anyone. Some people evidently want to delay that transition as long as possible, but it cannot be put off indefinitely. My colleagues at Post Carbon Institute and I believe that delaying this transition is extremely dangerous for a number of reasons. Obviously, it prolongs the environmental impacts from fossil fuel production and combustion. But also, the process of building a renewable energy economy will take decades and require a tremendous amount of investment. If we don’t start soon enough, society will get caught in a trap of skyrocketing fuel prices and a collapsing economy, and won’t be in a position to fund needed work on alternative energy development.
In my darker moments I fear that we have already waited too long and that it is already too late. I hope I’m not right about that, and when I talk to young people like you I tend to feel that we can make this great transition, and that actions that have seemed politically impossible for the past forty years will become inevitable as circumstances change, and as a new hearts and minds comes to the table.
Even in the best case, though, the fact that we have waited so long to address our addiction to oil will still present us with tremendous challenges. But this is not a problem for ExxonMobil, at least not anytime soon. When the price of oil goes up, we feel the pain while Exxon reaps the profits. Even though Exxon’s actual oil production is falling due to the depletion of its oilfields, corporate revenues are flush: Exxon made almost $11 billion in profits in just the past three months. This translates to jobs in the oil industry. But how about the renewable energy industry, which everyone agrees is the key to our future?
For the past forty years, every U.S. president, without exception, has said we must reduce our country’s dependence on imported petroleum. Addiction to oil has become our nation’s single greatest point of geopolitical, economic, and environmental vulnerability. Yet here we are in 2011, still driving a fleet of 200 million gasoline-guzzling cars, trucks, and SUVs. The inability of our elected officials to tackle such an obvious problem is not simply the result of ineptitude. In addition to funding climate denial, fossil fuel companies like Exxon have contributed to politicians’ election campaigns in order to gain perks for their industry and to put off higher efficiency standards and environmental protections. Denying looming fuel supply problems, discouraging a transition to renewable energy, distorting climate science—these are all understandable tactics from the standpoint of corporate self-interest. Exxon is just doing what corporations do. But once again, it is society as a whole that suffers, and the consequences will fall especially on your generation.
Mr. Tillerson may have informed you about his company’s Global Climate and Energy Project at Stanford University. Exxon is now funding research into lowering the cost and increasing the efficiency of solar photovoltaic devices, increasing the efficiency of fuel cells, increasing the energy capacity of lithium-ion batteries for electric cars, designing higher-efficiency engines that produce lower emissions, making biodiesel fuel from bacteria, and improving carbon capture and storage. This is all admirable, if it is genuine and not just window-dressing.
Here’s a reality check in that regard: Exxon is investing about $10 million a year in the Global Climate and Energy Project—an amount that almost exactly equals Mr. Tillerson’s personal compensation in 2010. Ten million dollars also equals about three hours’ worth of Exxon profits from last year. You tell me if you think that is a sensibly proportionate response to the problems of climate change and oil depletion from the world’s largest energy company.
Even if Exxon’s investments in a sustainable energy future were of an appropriate scale, they come late in the game. We are still in a bind. That’s because there is no magic-bullet energy source out there that will enable world energy supplies to continue to grow as fossil fuels dwindle.
Renewable energy is viable and necessary, and we should be doing far more to develop it. But solar, wind, geothermal, tidal, and wave power each have limits and drawbacks that will keep them from supplying energy as cheaply and as abundantly as we would like. Our bind is that we have built our existing transport infrastructure and food systems around energy sources that are becoming more problematic with every passing year, and we have no Plan B in place. This means we will probably have less energy in the future, rather than more.

A Chance to Change the World

Again, I am addressing my words especially to you students. This will be the defining reality of your lives. Whatever field you go into—business, finance, engineering, transportation, agriculture, education, or entertainment—your experience will be shaped by the energy transition that is now under way. The better you understand this, the more effectively you will be able to contribute to society and make your way in the world.
You will have the opportunity to participate in the redesign of the basic systems that support our society—our energy system, food system, transport system, and financial system.
We are at one of history’s great turning points. During your lifetime you will see world changes more significant in scope than human beings have ever witnessed before. You will have the opportunity to participate in the redesign of the basic systems that support our society—our energy system, food system, transport system, and financial system.
I say this with some confidence, because our existing energy, food, transport, and financial systems can’t be maintained under the circumstances that are developing—circumstances of fossil fuel depletion and an unstable climate. As a result, what you choose to do in life could have far greater implications than you may currently realize.
Over the course of your lifetime society will need to solve some basic problems:
  • How to grow food sustainably without fossil fuel inputs and without eroding topsoil or drawing down increasingly scarce supplies of fresh water;
  • How to support 7 billion people without depleting natural resources—including forests and fish, as well as finite stocks of minerals and metals; and
  • How to reorganize our financial system so that it can continue to perform its essential functions—reinvesting savings into socially beneficial projects—in the context of an economy that is stable or maybe even shrinking due to declining energy supplies, rather than continually growing.
Each of these core problems will take time, intelligence, and courage to solve. This is a challenge suitable for heroes and heroines, one that’s big enough to keep even the greatest generation in history fully occupied. If every crisis is an opportunity, then this is the biggest opportunity humanity has ever seen.
Making the best of the circumstances that life sends our way is perhaps the most important attitude and skill that we can hope to develop. The circumstance that life is currently serving up is one of fundamentally changed economic conditions. As this decade and this century wear on, we Americans will have fewer material goods and we will be less mobile. In a few years we will look back on late 20th century America as time and place of advertising-stoked consumption that was completely out of proportion to what Nature can sustainably provide. I suspect we will think of those times—with a combination of longing and regret—as a lost golden age of abundance, but also a time of foolishness and greed that put the entire world at risk.
It’s a time when it will be possible to truly change the world, because the world has to change anyway.
Making the best of our new circumstances will mean finding happiness in designing higher-quality products that can be re-used, repaired, and recycled almost endlessly; and finding fulfillment in human relationships and cultural activities rather than mindless shopping. Fortunately, we know from recent cross-cultural psychological studies that there is little correlation between levels of consumption and happiness. That tells us that life can in fact be better without fossil fuels.
stairs-jensen.jpgIn the Face of this Truth
It’s time to talk honestly about collapse–no matter how others may respond.
So whether we view these as hard times or as times of great possibility is really a matter of perspective. I would emphasize the latter. This is a time of unprecedented opportunity for service to one’s community. It’s a time when it will be possible to truly change the world, because the world has to change anyway. It is a time when you can make a difference by helping to shape this needed and inevitable change.
As I travel, I meet young people in every part of this country who are taking up the challenge of building a post-petroleum future: a 25-year-old farmer in New Jersey who plows with horses and uses no chemicals; the operator of a biodiesel co-op in Northampton; a solar installer in Oakland, California. The energy transition will require new thinking in every field you can imagine, from fine arts to banking. Companies everywhere are hiring sustainability officers to help guide them through the challenges and opportunities. At the same time, many young people are joining energy and climate activist organizations like 350.org and Transition Initiatives.

Police seek evidence of sex attack from IMF chief

By JENNIFER PELTZ AND ANGELA CHARLTON, Associated Press Jennifer Peltz And Angela Charlton, Associated Press1 min ago
NEW YORK – The head of the International Monetary Fund was examined for evidence that could incriminate him in the alleged sexual assault of a hotel maid, charges that stunned the global financial world and upended French presidential politics.
Dominique Strauss-Kahn, a married father of four whose reputation with women earned him the nickname "the great seducer," faced arraignment Monday on charges of attempted rape and criminal sexual contact in the alleged attack on a maid who went into his penthouse suite at a hotel near Times Square to clean it.
Strauss-Kahn was taken into custody on Saturday and spent more than 24 hours inside a Harlem precinct, where police say the maid identified him from a lineup, then headed to a hospital for a "forensic examination" requested by prosecutors to obtain more evidence in the case, defense lawyer William Taylor said. He was taken to a Manhattan court early Monday.
Another defense attorney, Benjamin Brafman, said the IMF managing director "intends to vigorously defends these charges and he denies any wrongdoing."
A member of France's Socialist party, Strauss-Kahn was widely considered the strongest potential challenger next year to President Nicolas Sarkozy, whose political fortunes have been flagging.
Environment Minister Nathalie Kosciusko-Morizet lamented the shadow the incident could cast on all of France.
"I'm very surprised to see at what speed in France we rush to political conclusions about a subject that is a serious one. He is accused of very serious acts. We are hardly speaking at all of the alleged victim," she said Monday on Canal-Plus television. In addition to the hotel maid, Koscuisko-Morizet said there is another "clear victim, which is France."
Strauss-Kahn, 62, was nabbed less than four hours after the alleged assault, plucked from first class on a Paris-bound Air France flight that was just about to leave the gate at John F. Kennedy International Airport.
He was alone when he checked into the luxury Sofitel hotel, not far from Times Square, on Friday afternoon, police said. It wasn't clear why he was in New York. The IMF is based in Washington, and he had been due in Germany on Sunday to meet with Chancellor Angela Merkel.
The 32-year-old maid told authorities that when she entered his spacious, $3,000-a-night suite early Saturday afternoon, she thought it was unoccupied. Instead, Strauss-Kahn emerged from the bathroom naked, chased her down a hallway and pulled her into a bedroom, where he sexually assaulted her, New York Police Department spokesman Paul J. Browne said.
The woman told police she fought him off, but then he dragged her into the bathroom, where he forced her to perform oral sex on him and tried to remove her underwear. The woman was able to break free again, escaped the room and told hotel staff what had happened, authorities said.
Strauss-Kahn was gone by the time detectives arrived moments later. He left his cellphone behind. "It looked like he got out of there in a hurry," Browne said.
The NYPD discovered he was at JFK and contacted officials at the Port Authority of New York and New Jersey, which runs the airport. Port Authority police officers arrested him.
The maid was taken by police to a hospital and was treated for minor injuries. Stacy Royal, a spokeswoman for Sofitel, said the hotel's staff was cooperating in the investigation and that the maid "has been a satisfactory employee of the hotel for the past three years."
Strauss-Kahn was arrested on charges of a criminal sex act, attempted rape and unlawful imprisonment. Authorities were looking for any forensic evidence and DNA.
His wife, Anne Sinclair, defended him in a statement to French news agency AFP.
"I do not believe for one second the accusations brought against my husband. I have no doubt his innocence will be established," said Sinclair, a New York-born journalist who hosted a popular weekly TV news broadcast in France in the 1980s and '90s.
The arrest could throw the long-divided Socialists back into disarray about who they could present as Sarkozy's opponent. Even some of his adversaries were stunned.
"It's totally hallucinating. If it is true, this would be a historic moment, but in the negative sense, for French political life," said Dominique Paille, a political rival to Strauss-Kahn on the center right, on BFM television. Still, he urged, "I hope that everyone respects the presumption of innocence. I cannot manage to believe this affair."
Candidates need to announce their intentions this summer to run in fall primary elections.
"If he's cleared, he could return — but if he is let off only after four or five months, he won't be able to run" because the campaign will be too far along, said Jerome Fourquet of the IFOP polling agency.
"I think his political career is over," Philippe Martinat, who wrote a book called "DSK-Sarkozy: The Duel," told The Associated Press. "Behind him he has other affairs ... I don't see very well how he can pick himself back up."
Strauss-Kahn is known as DSK in France, but media there also have dubbed him "the great seducer." His reputation as a charmer of women has not hurt his career in France, where politicians' private lives traditionally come under less scrutiny than in the United States.
In 2008, Strauss-Kahn was briefly investigated over whether he had an improper relationship with a subordinate female employee. The IMF board found his actions "reflected a serious error of judgment" yet deemed the relationship consensual.
But attempted rape charges are far more serious than extramarital flings and could do far more damage to his reputation in France and abroad.
"It's sure that a future president already mired in judicial problems is not well seen by the French," said Patricia Bous, a lab researcher in Paris' Left Bank on Monday.
"It's obvious that this is someone a lot of people were counting on, and because of this all of the cards are being reshuffled. So I don't know what's going to happen, but for me there is a presumption of innocence and we await the proof so we'll see," said university employee Hubert Javaux, also in the Left Bank.
French newspapers all put Strauss-Kahn on their front pages Monday morning, with grim headlines and photos. "DSK Out" read the banner headline on the left-leaning Liberation. "The Doors of the Elysee Are Closing for DSK" read that in Le Soir.
The New York allegations come amid French media reports about Strauss-Kahn's lifestyle, including luxury cars and suits, that some have dubbed a smear campaign. Some French raised suspicions about the sexual assault case as well.
"Perhaps this affair will unravel very quickly, if we learn that there is in the end no serious charge and that what was said by this woman was not true, and we all wish for this," former Socialist Party boss Francois Hollande said on Canal-Plus television. "To commit an act of such seriousness, this does not resemble the man I know."
A former economics professor, Strauss-Kahn served as French industry minister and finance minister in the 1990s, and is credited with preparing France for the adoption of the euro by taming its deficit.
He took over as head of the IMF in November 2007. The 187-nation lending agency provides help in the form of emergency loans for countries facing severe financial problems.
Sarkozy, who did not comment publicly Sunday, had championed Strauss-Kahn to run the IMF. Political strategists saw it as a way for Sarkozy to get a potential challenger far from the French limelight.
Caroline Atkinson, an IMF spokeswoman, issued a statement Sunday that said the agency would have no comment on the New York case. She referred all inquiries to Strauss-Kahn's personal lawyer and said the "IMF remains fully functioning and operational."
The fund's executive board was expected to be briefed on developments related to Strauss-Kahn on Sunday, but the meeting was postponed. John Lipsky, the IMF's first deputy managing director, would lead the organization in an acting capacity in Strauss-Kahn's absence.
Strauss-Kahn was supposed to be meeting in Berlin on Sunday with Merkel about increasing aid to Greece, and then join EU finance ministers in Brussels on Monday and Tuesday. The IMF is responsible for one-third of Greece's existing loan package, and his expected presence at these meetings underlined the gravity of the Greek crisis.
___
Charlton reported from Paris. Associated Press writers Elaine Ganley in Paris, Colleen Long, Cristian Salazar and Verena Dobnik in New York and Martin Crutsinger in Washington contributed to this report

Thursday, May 12, 2011

David Morgan on the Utah Coin Act. Silver / Gold Update 5/12/11

In short what has occured in Utah is that the state has chosen to excersise its ability as a State of the U.S.A. to implement Gold and Silver as a legal tender under "Article1, Section 10 of the United States Constitution which provides that no state shall make anything but gold and silver coin a tender for payment of debts."

This means that the State Legislators in Utah observing the outright lunacy at the Federal Government level with money printing just to keep up with Interest on the $14+ Trillion are taking action to pre empt Weimer Germany type situation where wheel barrels of money are required to purchase a loaf of bread. Good for them...

Other states that are looking at something similar:
Virginia House Joint Resolution 557
Georgia Constitutional Tender Act
Ohio Honest Money Project
Idaho Silver Gem Act, Bill No. 633
South Carolina House Bill No. 4501
Missouri House Bill No. 561
Washington House Joint Memorial 4010
Colorado Honest Money Act (HB09-1206)
Indiana Senate Bill No. 453
Montana House Bill No. 639
New Hampshire Gold Money Bill 1.

Wednesday, May 11, 2011

Forbes Predicts U.S. Gold Standard Within 5 Yearsby Paul Dykewicz

Forbes Predicts U.S. Gold Standard Within 5 Yearsby Paul Dykewicz

05/11/2011

A return to the gold standard by the United States within the next five years now seems likely, because that move would help the nation solve a variety of economic, fiscal, and monetary ills, Steve Forbes predicted during an exclusive interview this week with HUMAN EVENTS.



“What seems astonishing today could become conventional wisdom in a short period of time,” Forbes said.


Such a move would help to stabilize the value of the dollar, restore confidence among foreign investors in U.S. government bonds, and discourage reckless federal spending, the media mogul and former presidential candidate said. The United States used gold as the basis for valuing the U.S. dollar successfully for roughly 180 years before President Richard Nixon embarked upon an experiment to end the practice in the 1970s that has contributed to a number of woes that the country is suffering from now, Forbes added.


If the gold standard had been in place in recent years, the value of the U.S. dollar would not have weakened as it has and excessive federal spending would have been curbed, Forbes told HUMAN EVENTS. The constantly changing value of the U.S. dollar leads to marketplace uncertainty and consequently spurs speculation in commodity investing as a hedge against inflation.


The only probable 2012 U.S. presidential candidate who has championed a return to the gold standard so far is Rep. Ron Paul (R.-Tex.). But the idea “makes too much sense” not to gain popularity as the U.S. economy struggles to create jobs, recover from a housing bubble induced by the Federal Reserve’s easy-money policies, stop rising gasoline prices, and restore fiscal responsibility to U.S. government’s budget, Forbes insisted.


With a stable currency, it is “much harder” for governments to borrow excessively, Forbes said. Without lax Federal Reserve System monetary policies that led to the printing of too much money, the housing bubble would not have been nearly as severe, he added.


“When it comes to exchange rates and monetary policy, people often don’t grasp” what is at stake for the economy, Forbes said. By restoring the gold standard, the United States would shift away from “less responsible policies” and toward a stronger dollar and a stronger America, he said. “If the dollar was as good as gold, other countries would want to buy it.”


An encouraging sign for Forbes is that key lawmakers besides Rep. Paul are recognizing that the Fed is straying well beyond its intended role of promoting stable prices and full employment with its monetary policies.


Forbes cited Rep. Paul Ryan (R.-Wis.), who, he believes, understands monetary policy better than most lawmakers and has shown a willingness to ask tough but necessary questions. For example, when Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke appeared before the House Budget Committee in February, Ryan, who chairs the panel, asked Bernanke bluntly how many jobs the Fed’s quantitative-easing program had helped to create.


Politicians need to “get over” the notion that the Fed can guide the economy with monetary policy. The Fed is like a “bull in a China shop," Forbes said. “It can’t help but knock things down.”


“People know that something is wrong with the dollar," Forbes concluded. "You cannot trash your money without repercussions.”

And now for Something Interesting and Fun

Tuesday, May 10, 2011

Follow up on Last Weeks Smash and Grab on Silver by the CME 5/10/11


Submitted by: Francis Soyer 5/10/11

I came across this article by Theodore Butler regarding last weeks 84% margin hike on silver by the CME a blatant smash and grab technique of magnitude not seen since the Hunt Brothers tried taking on the CME and got their asses handed to them.

"But this week’s intentional price smash in silver brings us to a critical junction. No, I am not worried about the price of silver in the long term, as the realities of the supply and demand factors are stronger than any manipulation. What I am concerned about are the principles of market integrity and the rule of law. In those terms, what happened this week is the worst thing possible. The public has warned the Commission to no end about wrongdoing in the silver market, only to see that wrongdoing blatantly displayed again. There are many legitimate questions about what actually took place, such as the ones I have listed above."

Here is a link to the original article:  http://news.silverseek.com/SilverSeek/1304873055.php

My response to his remarks about being concerned about the rule of LAW and the enforcement of it is this.


The rule of law is in this country is Broken and badly so. There are two laws that exist, the first is that the monopolistic corporations and other corporate interests that recently the Supreme Court ruled must be treated the same as an individual and their respective rights as outlined in the Constitution and then the people and their rights. And the latter of the set of rights the Governement and its enforcement institutions could give two shits their rites. They serve the first set and only them and blatantly so.

The second part of the response would be to say that the Rule of Law does not apply to those who have power either by electoral process or appointment with or without consent of the population. The Iraqi invastion and war, Afghanistan, General Eclectric paying no taxes, no prosecutions for the massive mortgage fraud, a private bank that has complete autonomy from Governemental oversight, Guantonomo bay, The Patriot Act, If you need more examples of why this statement is Truth I suggest you go back and start with Richard Nixon and his pardon given via Jerald Ford. From then on the pattern is clear that there are two sets of laws. One is completely disregarded by those who have money, power and are intertwined with Governmental systems via corporate activity. The other is the LAW of the population that will be wielded by Governments to suppress and maintain a docile population to discourage revolt so that it can maintain its position of control and enforce its power by the fleecing of that population by supporting the corporate interest and taxation.

That said a better way to summarize came from a man named Martin Armstrong.
"It is normal for history to be generally ignored.This has been so because mankind is just arrogant, and most certainly stupid enough to believe that somehow we are more sophisticated today than our ancestors ever were centuries ago, so history offers nothing. It was Machiavelli who had the insightful talent to see why history repeats. He summed up the problem better than anyone else. He said history repeats because man never changes with time. So the greed for power always unfolds with the same result. Those who seize power directly or indirectly, refuse to see the consequences of their self-interests."
"Praetor’s Edict. He promoted this as official civil law for Roman citizens. Law had fallen into the grips of practice so that when people stood in a court, there was no real law, but DISCRETION of the Praetor. Thus, Hadrian realized that the corruption was always a cancer that feeds on the people and the only way to protect the economy is to keep a watchful eye over the Judiciary. For once the courts become corrupt, as we have again today; the economy suffers for CAPITAL is no longer safe. How can money be invested when the Rule of Law is nothing more than the DISCRETION of the judge?

Today’s battle that rages over the Supreme Court is all over “discretion” to change whether or not abortion is legal. In this current budget crisis, again it is social politics dominating fiscal responsibility for the Republicans want to shut down Planned Parenthood because of abortion, not to balance the budget. This proves the point that LAW is nothing more than DISCRETION of the judge; hence the battle over the Supreme Court. It is not really what the law IS, but what one judge IS WILLING to say it is over another. In this legal atmosphere, capital is NOT safe! Judges are not there to defend us or the Constitution, but whatever agenda that the political party might be who appointed them. In times of economic distress as we currently face, we are in serious trouble. The courts no longer provide a check and balance against the Executive or Legislative branches. The entire tripartite form of government has been usurped by politics. This is a CRITICAL prerequisite to the economic collapse. Once capital is no longer truly safe, it migrates and investment that creates economic growth declines as capital is driven to speculation and self-preservation."

Given that Capital is no longer safe what is one to do to survive? Well... they could buy Silver Futures contracts to gain and preserve wealth for the coming storm. Doing this is very dangerous in that the CME is a lawless institution and if you think your financial interests are what they are trying to protect you are in for a big surprise when they default, write your account to zero because they can, basically do whatever the hell they want when it suites them. Trading with them you are literally taking your life putting it into their hands and they will take it when it suites them I guarantee it!

The only way to operate outside this lawless system is to have silver in your hand. Not at a Bank, Not at some bullshit brokerage holding house, not with a SLV etf. It needs to be in your hands in your home, in a safe. This is the "store of value" you need to self preserve your wealth. The only other option is PSLV or a physical silver etf. but even then our government could just say as a matter of national security imports or cross border transactions of Silver are banned and you are fucked again. So in hand is the only option I can see rite now.

In answer to your query, what will Gensler do to remedy this situation? The answer is Absolutely Nothing and that is another guarantee I will stand behind.  Peace and Adonai

Silver update 5/10/11 PSLV / SLV


Submitted by: Francis Soyer

So what has changed from last week to this week... Fundamentally with Silver nothing save Geitner asking congress to print another $2 Trillion out of thin air or face bouncing checks from the Treasury or the big D Word Default. The other thing that has changed is that the Hong Kong Exchange has initiated their own exchange for Silver Contracts thus will make it harder for the CME to push prices lower in that the market which knows everything will arbitrage gross inefficiencies in price movement. I suspect the Hong Kong exchange for delivery of Silver crontracts was created in that Asian and other offshore buyers of Silver no longer have faith in the CME in their ability to make good on deliveries of the metal hence created their own to mitigate this risk. From a technical point of view the bounce after the CME raised margins by 84% last week to flush out week longs has been as violent as the move down. Some technicians believe we should see 50's again withing couple weaks.

 Adonia

Monday, May 9, 2011

James Turk - “Silver Will Hit New Highs in a Matter of Weeks”

With tremendous volatility in gold and silver, today King World News interviewed James Turk out of Spain, and subsequently Turk sent the following piece below exclusively for the KWN blog. When asked about gold Turk remarked, “I’m taking my cue here from the mining stocks.  The XAU once again held above the 200 level which has been the bottom of its trading range.  That suggests to me that both the mining shares and gold are sold out here and due for a big bounce.” 

The Osoma Factor is a Non Factor


Submitted by: Francis Soyer 5/9/11


Over the weekend I had the pleasure of a visit with the Parents for Mothers Day. My mother had a question, and it was will Bin Ladden being out of the picture improve prospects for the world economy. My answer was no absolutely not but as I thought about it more it occured to me that these politically motivated actions that are showcased in the media's eye are for a reason and the reason goes beyond beyond Obama being able to claim victory when it comes time to re-election next year.

If you look back iin time and have been following events like myself and other investment proffessionals what a pattern becomes apparent. The pattern is to showcase items of relative unimportance to focus attention away from matters that ar of importance. While our corporate media was abuzz with Bin Ladden news notice how little attention matters of much higher importance were ignored or recieved little attention like:

Secretary Geitner asking congress for $2 Trillion to avoid Government Default on the Governments Debt. Yes the treasury has run out of money and the interest payments alone are now in stage where as a country we can no longer afford the interest payments let alone being able to pay off the principle of those loans. To put $2 Trillion into perspective it is basically the same size of QE (Quantitative Easing Programs) by the Federal Reserve Bank of New York a private bank by the way...for QE programs I and II which has been operating since 2008. A three year program fort he Government or more accuratly U.S. taxpayers to buy the Governments debt in the amount of $2.1 Trillion. As it stands now without this additional $2 Trillion every U.S. Tax Payer if the bill on our tab came due rite now of roughly $16 Trillion would owe $1.5 Million. So for the average tax paying family in the U.S.A. with a household income of $40,000 and falling will spend the next 37.5 years giving %100 of their income in taxes to the Government to pay off that debt if the bill were payable now. That $40,000 annual income represents roughly 98% of the tax paying population in case you were wondering.

We got some bad news on the Job Market and not to no shock ignored:

The latest from John Williams’ ShadowStats.com.

No. 367: April Labor Numbers, Money Supply, Dollar and Precious Metals
- Increasingly Misleading Seasonal-Factors Continued to Pummel Accuracy of Jobs Data
- April Household Survey Showed 190,000 Employment Drop
n- April Unemployment Rates: 9.0% (U.3), 15.9% (U.6),  22.3% (SGS) and rising as we came in with a Initial Claims report of roughly 500,000! job losses. Anything beyond upper 300's means on a net basis the country is falling further  (This 22.3% Unenployment Rate is the REAL Number) The other two are extremely sugar coated by the Bearuae of Labor Statistics. They DO NOT ACCOUNT FOR PEOPLE WHO HAVE GIVEN UP ON FINDING WORK and are now wards of the State, via welfare and food stamps) For those in the investment community who do not understand, go to the BLS and look and how they calculate their findings, your eyes will be opened I gaurentee it.
- Broad Money Supply Gains in April
- Underlying Inflation, Dollar and Precious Metals Fundamentals Unchanged

To Re-iterate what is happening in the Economy on the Macro... THERE IS NO RECOVERY, In Fact the countries financial condition, employment, growth, prosperity all of it is headed down hill and has continued to do so Since 2008! Any news report that claims economic recovery is either on the take, been forbiden to report the truth or is simply brain dead. It is that simple.

So in terms of looking back to Bin Ladden and its relavence is completely irrelavent. The pattern of information flow from out leaders is that they would have you focus on WHAT IS NOT, rather than WHAT IS. They are basically proffessional liars. They opporate in their own self interests, which are the interests of those who financed their political carreer. What about Morality etc.? People act in their own self interests, and have since the dawn of civilization. Is what it is.
 
And while most of us watched Oboma on sixty minutes as if there were important news. The real interview we should have been watching is this one.
 
http://www.zerohedge.com/article/david-stockman-it-will-take-major-dislocation-bond-market-wake-america

Ransquawk European Morning Briefing 5/9/11

Friday, May 6, 2011

Silver update SLV / PSLV 5/5/11


Submitted by: Francis Soyer

We are 5 days in on this correction and here is what we know.

The CME over the past 8 or so trading sessions has hiked margins for Silver by 84%

Goldman is chirping to sell commodities which includes metals like Silver (So they can buy :)

Over the past 6 months this is the 3rd time Silver has breached its Volume Weighted Average Price. (A long time to wait if you are a VWAP type like myself) chart below



Yes the CME and Futures Brokers margin hikes will and do flush out week hands which helps those who are heavily short contracts like JPM and the likes

Yes this has occured historically before when Bullion competes with Fiat Money. This happened with the famous Hunt Brothers incident. So lets just take a look at exactly what happened with the Hunt Brothers a long time ago. This morning Zero Hedge posted the original article from Playboy magazine from 1980. Here it is. To summarize this article below..when you corner an animal and it's survival is threatened it will bite and become violent. Yes JPM's and others survival is in jeapordy, yes they are protected by various agencies, yes they will bite when cornered and do everything in their power to survive and this week is no ecxeption. The difference historically this time is that dollars are in their death rattles and will not be able to save them this time. So what do we do? We buy physical silver and stay the course.

Page 1 of 19


Silverfinger



By HARRY HURT III

September Issue 1980 Playboy





IN THE SUMMER of 1979, an invisible hand reached out from an island in the Atlantic

and quietly began tightening its grip on the world’s supply of silver. The fingers of that

hand extended to London, New York, Dallas, Zurich and Jidda. But the only visible clue

to its existence was a newly formed Bermuda shell corporation called International

Metals Investment Company Ltd. That dull sounding little trading company was not just

another offshore tax scam but the operating front for a secret partnership seemingly

capable of controlling the world price and supply of silver.

Appropriately enough, two of the principals in that cosmic alliance were Saudi Arabian businessmen with

connections to the Saudi royal family. But another principal, the real genius behind the deal, was an

American oil billionaire, the head of a clan sometimes referred to as “the royal family of Texas.” Though

not quite as rich as the Saudi royalty, this man was one of the few private individuals in the world capable

of playing in the same league. A lover of intrigue, in the past he had made international headlines with his

mysterious wheeling and dealing. Before long, he would again blaze across the front pages. But for the

time being, he remained in the shadows, operating behind the corporate veil of International Metals. His

name: Nelson Bunker Hunt.

“He wins and loses millions in his everyday dealing, but he’ll search for fallen change in chair cushions.”

In that same summer, just before the price of silver, exploded, an extraordinary invitation went out from

Dallas to most of the better known Texas millionaires. The invitation informed recipients, “You, together

with your wife or husband if convenient, are cordially invited to be our guest at a very important meeting

that could help determine the destiny of civilization.” The invitation went on to promise that participants

would “hear and discuss plans and strategies that are not only having a profound moral and spiritual impact

upon many nations but are also a critical deterrent to the avalanche of evil that is threatening to engulf the

world.”

As revealed on the front of the invitation in black letters, the sponsor of that urgent conference was Here’s

Life, a branch of the controversial and archconservative Campus Crusade for Christ. The host committee

list included such luminaries as Roy Rogers, former Nixon patron W. Clement Stone, two U. S. Senators,

the cofounder of Holiday Inns and the owner of the Dallas Cowboys.

Also listed on the host committee was a scion of one of right-wing Christianity’s most prominent families-a

man whose image could hardly be called charitable. But his philanthropy had made the headlines on one

occasion: the day back in 1977 when he had publicly pledged to help raise one billion dollars for Campus Page 2 of 19

Crusade. Now, by contributing his letterhead and his money to Here’s Life, he was fulfilling his pledge. His

name: Nelson Bunker Hunt.



Silver and salvation, two apparently unrelated commodities, are vitally intertwined in the prodigious person

of Nelson Bunker Hunt. As the son of the late H. L. Hunt, the eccentric and irascible Texas oil billionaire,

Bunker is still driven to prove himself a moneymaker in his old man’s image. But his great silver play of

1979-1980, like many of his other dealings in the past decade, is not only the expression of his desire for

gain; it is also a fundamental expression of his world view, one that is usually labeled archconservative.

Like his father before him, Bunker Hunt envisions an international Communist conspiracy and the Eastern-

liberal-establishment-Rockefeller-CIA conspiracy. For reasons that are alternately well founded and

fantastical, he believes himself and his family to be victims of both. Even more fundamentally, he

possesses a vision of the apocalypse, a conviction that the world is heading down the road to doom.



True to family tradition, Bunker Hunt does not intend to sit idly by while catastrophe descends upon the

planet. For him, hoarding silver is not just his way of hedging inflation: It is also part of his attempt to

create his own independent economy, his own money. The government treasuries of the world used to be

the ones to issue currencies backed by precious metals. Like the United States, most countries have long

since ceased that practice. Bunker has been trying to revive it for himself and his silver buying partners.

Hoarding silver is part of his scheme to replace paper with something of “real” value. It is his hedge against

the “avalanche of evil” he fears is engulfing the world. Ironically, it was also what brought about a personal

and public financial apocalypse of the first order.



The story of Nelson Bunker Hunt is the story of his money. Along with his brothers and sisters, he controls

what may well be America’s largest family fortune. Since the Hunt wealth is privately held, there are no

published balance sheets for the empire as a whole. In addition, arriving at an exact determination of the

family wealth is complicated by varying appraisals that can be given to real estate and oil properties, and by

discount factors that must be figured in because of certain asset illiquidity. But according to inside sources

and those figures that are publicly available, the so-called first family of H. L. Hunt controls assets that

were worth roughly 12 to 14 billion dollars when the price of silver peaked in January of this year. The

flagship of the family wealth is Placid Oil; the world’s largest privately owned Oil Company, with reserves

worth in excess of six billion dollars. But the family also has extensive holdings in coal, real estate, cattle,

sports teams and, of course, silver.

Since silver’s crash, the family’s asset worth has depreciated to the eight-to-ten-billion-dollar range. The

Hunts have also taken on a considerable amount of debt. In addition to multibillion dollar borrowing done

in the normal course of business operations, the silver play alone has added roughly one and three quarter

billion dollars to their liabilities, which itself exceeds the amount of the much publicized Government

guaranteed loan to beleaguered Chrysler Corporation. Nevertheless, it is a good bet that these Hunts would

still come out at least three to five billion dollars ahead if all their assets and all their debts were liquidated

tomorrow.

Strictly speaking, Bunker Hunt has a personal claim on about three to six billion dollars’ worth of the

family wealth. The rest is divided among his sisters, Margaret Hunt Hill and Caroline Schoellkopf, his

mentally ill brother Hassie and his two active brothers, W. Herbert and Lamar. The major parts of Bunker’s

personal holdings are a 20 percent share of Placid Oil, which is owned by his trust; a one-third share of

Penrod Drilling, which he owns in partnership with Herbert and Lamar; at least 50 percent of the family’s

more than 100,000,000 ounces of silver, which he owns in partnership with Herbert; a sizable share of the

family’s choice real estate holdings; and nearly 1000 thoroughbred race horses. Bunker also carries a

considerable portion of the family’s debt, including an estimated $500,000,000 worth incurred as a result of

his silver play. Page 3 of 19

While his individual holdings make him the richest (if not the most liquid) of H. L. Hunt’s heirs, they

represent only a fraction of the total wealth at his command. All his family’s holdings operate beneath the

umbrella of Hunt Energy Corporation. Each of Bunker’s four active siblings sits on the board of directors

of Hunt Energy, and each has his or her own bailiwick. But the chairman of Hunt Energy and the leader of

the family is Nelson Bunker Hunt.

The successor to old H. L.’s myth as well as his money, Bunker is the kind of Texas character who is often

described as “larger than life,” then is pigeon holed in the smallest of stereotypes. He has been compared to

the obstinately independent Jett Rink of Edna Ferber’s Giant and to the unremittingly evil J. R. Ewing of

the CBS television series Dallas. In a slightly kinder comparison, someone once said that he was “like Burl

Ives playing Bunker Hunt in a Tennessee Williams play.” In light of his recent silver exploits, however, it

might be more appropriate to describe him as an Ian Fleming character come to life: Nelson Bunker Hunt is

Silverfinger.

The truly fascinating thing about him, of course, is that he is a character no novelist could invent. Like his

father, Bunker is a man who believes that the rules that apply to ordinary people simply do not apply to

him. But he does not smoke or drink and he does his gambling at the office, not at the card table or the

bettors’ windows at the racetrack. Although he wins and loses millions in his everyday wheeling and

dealing, he will search for fallen change in the cushions of chairs and couches as feverishly as if he were

searching for the world’s largest silver vein. He lives in a French provincial mansion in the most exclusive

section of Dallas, but he drives a seven-year-old Cadillac and flies commercial airlines-usually tourist class.

He has been known to negotiate to the last penny on conventional oil deals (“He doesn’t just want to make

a good deal for both sides, he wants the other guy to bleed,” says one former associate), but he has

committed himself to such non conventional projects as an expedition to find Noah’s ark, an attempt to

salvage the Titanic and a venture in manufacturing two passenger helicopters that literally never got off the

ground. He has been photographed with the Queen of England, has done business with Saudi royalty and

heads of state all over the world but is down home enough to talk with horse trainers and ranch hands as if

he were their next door neighbor.

“H. L. could find more oil with a road map than Bunker could find with a platoon of geologists.”

Time and again, Bunker has echoed the almost wacky anti-Semitism formerly attributed to his father. He

jokingly refers to one of his lawyers as “Super Jew” and recently told a reporter that he was not prejudiced

against Jews but added, “They are a little different, like a Chinaman or whatever is different; you do have

to say that.” One of those differences, in Bunker’s view, is intelligence. He definitely believes that Jews are

smarter than everyone else, and he is not above using their smarts when it is to his business advantage. As

he told one associate. “Never look a gift Jew in the mouth.” Despite such retrograde sentiments, one of

Bunker’s very best friends in Dallas is M. B. Rudman, a flamboyant Jewish oilman who wears flashy

clothes and plumed hats and runs an exercise ranch often populated by attractive young ladies.

Unlike his prolific father, Bunker does not have any secret families. He and his wife, Caroline, have four

children, three grandchildren and a rather prudish social image. However, former aides and acquaintances

confirm that he definitely has an eye for the ladies, and he has been seen in the company of such lovelies as

actress Ursula Andress.

Bunker’s most obvious excess is food. In the past few years, he has ballooned to as much as 300 pounds,

but he continues to indulge in favorite delights such as cheeseburgers, chocolate milk, pies and, most of all,

ice cream. But despite his hefty size and his tendency to be a heavy sleeper, he is full of energy and is

remarkably light on his feet; he tries (with varying success) to maintain a regimen of jogging and

racquetball.

He runs his empire with the help of a vice president who is a former FBI agent. He does not, however,

travel with a bodyguard and he lists both his home and his office telephone numbers in the Dallas directory. Page 4 of 19

Asked about his apparent casualness, he replies, “Why should I worry? Worrying is for people with strong

intellect or weak character.”

Although he sometimes comes off as a fat, squinty eyed bumbler, he is sharp and crafty and gifted with the

same natural mathematical mind his father had. He can, for example, reel off the bloodlines and racing

statistics of his horses and the depths and production figures of his oil wells as if he were reading from a

book. He also has extraordinary bursts of creative vision. “Bunker has flashes just like the old man used to

have,” says one family member. “Sometimes he’s brilliant. The rest of the time you wonder whether he’s

really there with you or not.”

Excited by those ventures that offer big risks and big rewards, he has both his father’s gambling instinct

and his unquenchable drive to acquire and acquire until he dominates whatever field he is in. As a former

colleague remarked in reference to Bunker’s dealings in everything from horses to silver, “He doesn’t just

want some of it. He wants it all.”

Central to Bunker’s motivation is the view of money he inherited from his old man. “Money,” he once said

in an interview, “never really meant anything to me. It was just something that if you wanted to spend it,

you would have it. My father never really cared about money, either. It was just sort of how they kept the

score in life, in business.”

Demonstrating proficiency as a moneymaker was a way for H. L.’s children to win their father’s fickle

attention. For that reason, Bunker and all the rest of his siblings learned at an early age to value all 100

pennies in every Hunt dollar. Their greed, such as it is, does not result from mere financial cravings but

from an emotional quest for both love and money.

In his early years, Bunker did not have an easy time getting either one. Born in El Dorado, Arkansas, on

February 22, 1926, he grew up in the shadow of his father’s legend. In addition to being a gambler, an oil

billionaire, a health fanatic and a right-wing propagandist, H. L. Hunt sired 15 children in three separate

families.

He began his first family in ordinary fashion by marrying Lyda Bunker Hunt, who was Bunker’s mother.

He also, however, began secret families with Frania Tye and Ruth Ray while he was still married to and

living with Lyda. After Lyda died, H. L. married Ruth and gave their four children his name. Driven by an

extraordinary reserve of libidinous energy, H. L. loved sex well into his later years, but he did not regard

his relationships with Frania and Ruth as mere love affairs. Rather, he very much intended them to produce

children, because he believed he carried a “genius gene.” He felt that by fathering more children, he was

doing the world a favor.

As if all that were not enough to live up to, Bunker had to compete for H. L.’s favor with his brother

Hassie. The oldest of the Hunt sons, Hassie was his father’s physical likeness and his runaway favorite.

Thanks to what H. L. regarded as a mystical ability to find oil, Hassie was a millionaire in his own right by

the age of 21. A short time after that, however, he suffered an incapacitating mental breakdown. H. L. sent

Hassie to every major treatment center in the country, then decided to risk what was considered the latest

advance in psychiatry: a prefrontal lobotomy. The lobotomy calmed Hassie down, but he has been under

24-hour care ever since.

H. L. kept on looking for a new miracle cure and another Hassie. Disappointed on both counts, he took

much of his frustration out on his next son, Bunker. When not simply ignoring him, the old man was often

finding fault, bawling him out, belittling him. By the time Bunker had begun to work at Hunt Oil on a full-

time basis, H. L. had let it be known that he thought his second son by Lyda was stupid and unfit to succeed

him. The old man then shifted his favor to Bunker’s younger brothers, Herbert and Lamar. Page 5 of 19

While H. L.’s attitude was hardly fair, Bunker did not do much to impress anyone in his early years. After

dropping out of college, he embarked on an ambitious international oil exploration program and promptly

drilled $11,000,000 worth of dry holes.

H. L. was not impressed. Appalled at Bunker’s losses, he groused that he could find more oil with a road

map than Bunker could find with a whole platoon of fancy geologists. But with a stubborn persistence that

could only have been inherited, Bunker kept right on drilling in other overseas locations. Some

$250,000,000 worth of dry holes later, he finally hit in Libya. His find was known as the Sarir Field and its

reserves were estimated at 11 to 13 billion barrels of oil. A little over half of that strike belonged to British

Petroleum, but the rest was all Bunker’s. Even at the then-depressed world price of about two dollars per

barrel, his interest was worth up to five billion dollars, or about twice as much as H. L.’s fortune.

All of a sudden, Bunker, the unfavored son, was, at least on paper, the world’s wealthiest private

individual. As a practical matter, however, he was nearly broke. All the dry holes had decimated his trust

income, and his Libyan find would not make up for it until pipelines could be built, a project that would

take several more years. In the meantime, Bunker had no choice but to suffer the humiliation of turning to

his still-skeptical father for a loan.

“Qaddafi nationalized Hunt’s holdings, saying he wanted to give America ‘a strong slap in the face.”

Eventually, though, Bunker’s Libyan production did come on stream, and he commenced a series of

worldwide business adventures culminating in his great silver play of 1979-1980. Yet with each new deal,

he still seemed bent on proving that he was a moneymaker worthy of the family name. He also seemed de-

termined to prove his allegiance to his father’s brand of politics.

Some of Bunkers money giving consisted of regular $5000 tithes to H. L.’s Facts Forum and Life Line

foundations, which produced right-wing political messages once carried on more than 400 radio stations

from coast to coast. But instead of jumping on the old man’s bandwagon full time, Bunker found an

alternative in the like-thinking John Birch Society. As its founder, Robert Welch, became a kind of

surrogate political father, Bunker became the organization’s largest contributor, with annual gifts new

estimated to be in the $250,000 range.

Like H. L., Bunker has been relatively stingy with his contributions to mainstream politicians. In 1968,

however, he set up a secret $1,000,000 trust fund to induce General Curtis LeMay to run as the Vice-

Presidential candidate on the George Wallace ticket. He counts among his mainstream political friends

Senator Jesse Helms of North Carolina and Senator Strom Thurmond of South Carolina and former

Treasury Secretary John Connally.

Bunker’s interest in silver began one day at the Hunts’ Circle T ranch outside Dallas. The year was 1970

and Bunker was sitting in one of his favorite places, the kitchen, talking with a New York commodities

broker named Alvin J. Brodsky. A short, excitable man, Brodsky had flown down to Texas to make what

would turn out to be one of the most important sales pitches of his career. His method was simple but

graphic. As the cattle grazed outside, Brodsky gestured at the items in the room, the tablecloth, the utensils,

the food and he asked a single question: ‘Bunker, do you believe you’re going to have to pay more for these

things next year than you did this year?” Bunker allowed that he did. “Well, then,” Brodsky said, “you

should consider silver.”

Simplistic as it may have sounded, Brodsky’s pitch jibed perfectly with Bunker’s financial situation and his

total worldview. At the time, his Libyan oil venture had reached payout, and income was pouring in at a

peak rate in the neighborhood of $30,000,000 per year, all of it tax free. Bunker had to find a place to put it.

However, both domestic and world oil prices were at “depressed” pre embargo levels of two and three

dollars per barrel, and most of the so-called experts were saying that there were enough available foreign

and domestic reserves to meet America’s demands for decades. The per-ounce price of silver was also at a Page 6 of 19

low of about a dollar and a half, an even lower unit price than oil. But Bunker believed that silver might be

in for an enormous increase in price.

The inflationary future Brodsky illustrated at the Circle T was one main reason. Bunker personally believed

that inflation would grow worse. More generally, he believed that life on earth, politics, living standards

and population was going to grow worse too, and he saw plenty of evidence to support his view: There was

a war in Vietnam, turmoil in the Middle East and riots in American streets. In Libya, a left-wing radical

named Colonel Muammar el-Qaddafi had recently deposed the king and was already making threatening

gestures at Bunker and the other American oil operators there.

Even his own personal future looked perilous. A few months before his meeting with Brodsky, a massive

embezzlement scandal erupted in his old man’s HLH food products division. Bunker and Herbert were

convinced that the culprits were their aging father’s closest aides. Unable to convince H. L., they decided

that the only way to get definitive proof was by wire tapping the suspects. In January of 1970, one of the

private eyes the Hunts had hired to do the wire tapping was arrested for running a stop sign. Now the

Hunts’ wiretap caper was on the verge of exploding into the pre-Watergate era’s most sensational bugging

scandal.

Brodsky was not the only person who recommended silver. There were Bunker’s former prep school

roommate Ted Jansey and Dallas silver brokers Don and Scott Dial. As those and other silver bugs

reminded Bunker, it was then illegal for Americans to buy gold. That left few attractive precious metal

choices for a U. S. citizen who believed the world was going to hell in a hack. So shortly after hearing

Brodsky’s pitch, Bunker and Herbert began buying silver.

They bought slowly at first, making purchases in 5000 and 10,000 ounce “penny packets,” mostly through

Bache Halsey Stuart Shields, the commodities outfit with which Brodsky was associated. The total amount

of those investments was only a few hundred thousand dollars, small change by Hunt standards. The initial

results, however, were of the sort Bunker and his brother could readily appreciate. Between 1970 and 1973,

silver rose to about three dollars an ounce.

Meanwhile, both the world situation and Bunker’s personal situation worsened. In what turned out to be a

prelude to the Arab oil embargo that fall, Qaddafi nationalized Bunker’s Libyan holdings in May of 1973,

announcing that he wanted to give America “a strong slap in the face.” In January of that year, Bunker and

Herbert were indicted for illegal wire-tapping. Charging that the Justice Department had reneged on a

secret deal not to prosecute them, they claimed that the CIA had induced Justice to go ahead with the

prosecution anyway because the agency was angered by Bunker’s refusal to place an agent in his Libyan

operations. They also alleged that Paul Rothermel, their father’s former security chief, had been granted

immunity from prosecution in the HLH food-embezzlement case because he was a Government agent

spying on the family.

Nevertheless, the Justice Department continued to press its case against the Hunts. Bunker and Herbert

were eventually indicted on charges of obstruction of justice for allegedly offering payments to their private

eyes to keep their involvement in the wire tapping a secret.

With the world apparently crumbling all around him, Bunker decided to go heavily into silver. This time,

he and his brother Herbert, aided by second family in-law Randy Kreiling, a commodities expert, began

buying into the market with what would soon come to be known as the typical Hunt style. The key

elements in their strategy were size, secrecy and surprise. Working through Bache and a variety of other

brokers, they purchased not just penny packets but also millions and millions of ounces. Their first huge

order was a 20,000,000-ounce December 1973 contract. Other big orders followed, and by early 1974, the

Hunts had accumulated contracts totaling 55,000,000 ounces, or about seven to nine percent of the total

estimated world supply. That gave them more silver than anyone on earth save the governments of a few

countries and the silver exchanges themselves. Page 7 of 19

“Since the Hunts were taking delivery on their contracts, they had to put up roughly $160,000,000.”

Bunker and Herbert placed their orders with more than the usual concern for confidentiality. Secret buying

strategies are common in the commodity futures markets, where leaks of a big purchase can send prices

skyrocketing. But most silver traders trade only in paper, not actual metal. The Hunts, however, were

taking delivery on their contracts, all 55,000,000 ounces’ worth. That meant they had to put up roughly

$160,000,000 in cash. Taking delivery on all that silver also meant that they had to store it somewhere. And

that, in turn, necessitated the second and more secret phase of their silver buying scheme.

Most of the details of the Hunts’ great silver roundup are still secret, but sources familiar with the operation

say it began with a shoot-out at the Circle K ranch. The property of H. L.’s second family, the Circle K is a

2500-acre spread located east of Dallas. As straw boss for the operation, Kreiling recruited a dozen

cowboys from the Circle K by holding a shooting match to see who were the best marksmen. The winners

received a special assignment: riding shotgun on the Hunts’ hoard of silver.

With guns in hand, the Circle K cowboys flew up to New York aboard three chartered 707s. The planes

came from a nationally known charter company, but the name of the firm was covered with tape so that the

only visible identifying marks were the planes’ registration numbers. The aircraft landed at La Guardia in

the dead of night. A short time after their arrival, a convoy of armored trucks arrived from the New York

Commodity Exchange warehouse. Inside were 40,000,000 ounces of silver bullion. The transfer took place

almost wordlessly. There was no joking or grabassing, just serious loading. When the planes were full, the

Cowboys climbed in and the pilots got clearance for takeoff. Their destination: Zurich.

Upon their arrival in Switzerland, the Hunt planes were met by another convoy of armored trucks. The

cowboys and the armed guards transferred the silver from the planes to the trucks. Then the bullion was

driven to six secret storage locations in Zurich. Five of them were in bank vaults, among them the vault of

Credit Suisse. However, the Hunts’ silver hoard was too much for the available bank vaults to handle. The

excess bullion had to be stored in the coffers of a Swiss warehouse named Freidlager.

The costs of that transatlantic storage operation were enormous. Chartering the three 707s involved nearly

$200,000. On top of that, storage costs for silver ran on the average of a half Cent per ounce per mouth. For

the 40,000,000 ounces stashed in Europe anti the 15,000,000 ounces still its exchange warehouses in

Chicago and New Jersey, the annual storage charges amounted to some $3,000,000. Still, flying the bullion

to Switzerland was cheaper than taking it home to Texas, where the Hunts would have had to pay a four

and-a-quarter percent franchise tax to the state. More important, having his silver locked away in Swiss

banks added to what Bunker wanted out of the deal most of all: a sense of security about his wealth.

For all his precautions, Bunker could not keep his silver buying scheme a secret for long. In the spring of

1974, word hit the silver trading floors of the world that a mysterious Texan named Hunt had just taken

delivery on more silver than any single buyer had purchased in recent memory. The price rose to over six

dollars ‘per ounce. Veteran traders were in a panic. Even as they frantically asked one another, “Who’s

Nelson Bunker Hunt” they whispered that the man was about to corner the market.

In most modern markets, talk of a corner would have been dismissed as just that, talk. The classic definition

of a precious metals corner is when an Individual holds enough bullion and enough futures contracts to

have a virtual monopoly on the total supply, and thus effective control of the price of both bullion and

futures, since anyone who wanted the metal would have to come to him. Few people or groups have the

skill or the financial resources to pull one off. Indeed, the last time anyone cornered the silver market was

when the Bank of England accomplished the feat in 1717. As the veteran traders knew, however, silver was

potentially more vulnerable titan other commodities. Unlike gold, it has a wide range of industrial uses

(most notably for photographic film), as well as a value in jewelry making. Annual production in 1974 was

only about 245,000,000 ounces, while annual consumption was about 450,000,000 ounces. Exactly how

much the total world supply amounted to was anybody’s guess. Estimates ranged from 600,000,000 ounces

to 800,000,000 ounces. Of that total, only 200,000,000 ounces was believed to be available for delivery Page 8 of 19

against silver futures contracts. While silver from tea sets, silverware and other sources had a way of

coining out of the woodwork in times of high prices, many traders believed that it would take a lot less titan

200,000,000 ounces to corner the silver commodities market. But how much less? Had Bunker Hunt found

the magic formula? Was he now ready to cash in?

In April of 1974, Bunker stopped in New York to visit the floor of the Commodity Exchange for the first

time in his life. When he walked onto the floor, all activity came to a halt. The traders chopped what they

were doing and simply stared at the overweight, spectacled Texan in the cheap blue suit. Later that day,

Bunker granted a rare interview to a reporter from the financial journal Barron’s. Although he politely

refused to reveal the size of his silver holdings, Bunker did give the world a glimpse of his long term

intentions. As he put it in typically twisted syntax, ‘‘Just about anything you buy, rather than paper, is

better. You’re bound to come out ahead, in the long pull. If you don’t like gold, use silver, or diamonds or

copper, but something. Any damn fool can run a printing press.

On November 29, 1974, H. L. Hunt died at the age of 85. His death prompted a three way family feud that

would put the petty bickering of television’s Ewing clan to shame. In his will, H. L. left all of his stock in

Hunt Oil-about 80 percent of the company’s shares-to his second wife, Ruth; and he named 31-year-old

Ray L. Hunt, his son by Ruth as his sole independent executor.

While many of their friends thought the will was fair, Bunker and his siblings were furious. The first family

hail already inherited the bulk of H. L’s billions through their trusts. Hunt Oil still serviced the accounts of

the first family- owned companies such as Placid Oil and Penrod Drilling, but the oil and real-estate

properties still technically a part of Hunt Oil amounted to only $300000000, or about one tenth of what the

first family had already gotten. Still, $300,000,000 was $300,000,000. What’s more, the first family

objected to the will on status grounds. They (lid not like the second family and felt that the naming of their

illegitimately born half brother as sole executor had bumped them into second place.

Finally, Bunker and Herbert informed Ray that the first family had decided to go their own separate way.

Bunker and the others moved their offices from the Hunt Oil headquarters on the 29th floor of the First

National Bank Building to the 25th floor. There they formed a new parent corporation called Hunt Energy.

Shortly after the first and second families split, Frania Tye Lee, the mother of H. L.’s third and still secret

family, filed suit for a larger share of the estate. Her children filed a separate suit to be recognized as the

legitimate heirs of H. L. Hunt. Her suit went to trial in Shreveport, Louisiana, Federal court in January

1978. After five days of sensational testimony, the families settled with Mrs. Lee for $7,500,000. Before

the final papers could be signed, Mrs. Lee’s sons began objecting to the agreement. The matter is

unresolved to this day.

Amid all that family feuding, Bunker faced the unsettling prospect of a jury trial for wire-tapping. No

sooner had he formed Hunt Energy than he had to make contingency plans for running the family empire in

the event of a conviction. He decided to take another stab at improving his silver position.

By this time, Bunker and Herbert had owned their 55,000,000 ounces for about a year, but the price was

languishing around four dollars. Bunker still had confidence in the long-term outlook for the metal, but he

was now in an ever tightening cash squeeze. He believed, however, that if he could get another big buyer to

join him in the silver market, prices might begin to rise again, maybe even catch fire.

So in early March of 1975, Bunker left Dallas with a tourist-class plane ticket and high hopes of finding a

kindred spirit in the Middle East. When he arrived in London, he and an aide changed to reserved first-class

seats on a flight for Tehran. That was not usually Bunker’s custom, flying first class, but on this particular

day, he flew first class for a very good reason. When he arrived at the lariat airport, he was being met by his

friend Maimed Reza Palaver, the shah’s brother, and he wanted to make the best possible impression. He

had a business proposal for the Iranians: He wanted them to buy silver. Page 9 of 19

Upon his arrival in Tehran, Bunker was ushered via chauffeur driven limousine to an appointment with the

Iranian finance minister, Ansari. Butt despite his entree to the Palaver family, Bunker was unable to get a

firm commitment from them to buy silver.

Choking and headachy from the Tehran smog, Bunker caught the next

plane out, which happened to be bound for Zurich. Along the way, he decided that he might as well go on

up to Paris and see his racehorses. Then he got another idea: Why not try the Saudis?

When he landed in Zurich, Bunker sent his aide to telephone the family’s Middle East expert in New York.

The expert’s name was Benjamin Harrison Freedman. A friend and contemporary of Bunker’s late father,

Freedman was a longtime right-wing activist. As such, he was typical of the Hunt family’s informal brain

trust, an amazing assortment of mostly archconservative and often slightly eccentric wizards of sciences

and pseudo sciences ranging from economics to climatology.

Freedman advised Bunker to slow down. All the Middle East was aware of his trip to Tehran. To fly right

over to Saudi Arabia would only offend King Faisal by making him seem second to the shah. Freedman

urged Bunker to fly back to the United States first, and he would then make an appointment for him to see

the king in about two weeks. That way, Bunker could show the proper respect for the king by coming

directly from his own home country.

Bunker followed Freedman’s advice. A meeting was arranged for three weeks thence. Bunker went on to

Paris to see his horses and flew back to the U. S. Then on March 25, King Faisal was assassinated.

Faisal’s deaths and the Hunt Brothers’ upcoming wire tapping trial brought Bunker’s silver play to a halt.

Grimly, he and Herbert completed their contingency plans for the worst. With the coaching of their

attorney Phil Hirschkop, they also affected a reunion with the second family. When they arrived in

Lubbock for the Start o the trial, the two families were flashing beauty contest smiles, giving gush

interviews to the press chatting with use locals like new neighbors and generally acting like the most

harmonious collection of kinfolk in America.

When the trial began in September, the Hunts pleaded ignorance of the law. Their excuse was that a new

wiretap statute had just gone into effect and the Watergate scandal had not occurred at the time of their

alleged misdeeds. Secondly, the brothers claimed they had no evil intent in wire tapping only a desire to

protect their aging father from the thieves within his empire. The jury bought it all and acquitted the

brothers in record time.

Bunker’s performance lived rip to his best standards. Though visibly concerned before the trial, he actually

dozed off at one point in the proceedings. After the trial, he was fully awake and noticeably relieved, and

his first comment was to point up the exorbitant costs of Government harassment. In the five year legal

battle leading to their acquittal, he and his brother had spent an estimated $ 1,000,000 in legal fees. “If

Herbert and I had been just ordinary people,” Bunker observed. “We could have been in real Trouble.”

Following the wire tapping trial, Bunker was still in a cash squeeze and silver was still his biggest problem.

But he refused to sell out or sit on the sidelines while other deals passed him by. Unable to get the price of

silver to move, he decided to borrow against his bullion and invest that cash in other big commodity plays.

Such a strategy involved a double risk: If silver kept declining and his other plays also failed, he would be

in more of a pinch than ever. But then, big risks were just the thing that got the Hunt blood stirring. So,

with his silver at a standstill, he hunched a family invasion of other commodities markets.

One was a lucrative but tempestuous bout in soybeans futures (in which Bunker was rightly accused by the

Commodity Futures Trading Commission of violating the 3,000,000-bushel limit by any individual or

group). The Hunts also began to focus on another area of the market. The initial object of the quest was

sugar; the immediate target was Great Western United, the nation’s largest sugar refiner. ‘The deal had

begun shortly before H. L.’s death as a spur of the moment $3,000,000 stock investment. Then the Hunts Page 10 of 19

discovered that Great Western was plagued with management problems and, in late 1974, decided to buy

61 percent control of the company by laying out $30,000,000 more. All of a sudden, the Hunts found

themselves with a publicly owned corporation and all sorts of disclosure problems they had never had to

put up with in the family’s privately held enterprises. To make matters worse, the bottom dropped out of

the sugar market during the first year of the takeover, and Great Western revenues declined some

$100,000,000.

Once again, Bunker turned to silver. Convinced that he could reverse some of Great Western’s losses by

getting the company into precious metals, he had it sell its sugar futures and start buying silver futures. By

the spring of 1976, Great Western’s trading company was out of all commodities except silver. Late that

year, Great Western took delivery on some 20,000,000 ounces of bullion.

At that point, Bunker concocted one of his most cosmic schemes: a plan to trade that silver to the

Philippines through Great Western. The Philippines would then send Great Western raw sugar for its

refineries and exchange the silver for Saudi crude. With the Arabs into the silver market for $100,000,000

worth, the price of silver would rise, Great Western would have sugar, the Philippines would have oil and

all sides would be happy.

Herbert went over to the Philippines and got a favorable response from President Marcos. But the

International Monetary Fund, which lent a great deal of money to the Philippines to buy crude, said it

would not recognize silver as part of the country’s national resources. In effect, the IMF ruling meant that

the 20,000,000 ounces of bullion would be worthless in trying to get loans. With that, Bunker’s scheme fell

through. Great Western sold its bullion in early 1977 for $88,500,000, thus offsetting a substantial part of

the revenues lost due to the collapse of the sugar market. Still, the company continued to operate in the red.

After the sale, the Hunt brothers took Great Western out of the silver futures market, but not out of silver.

Now they began using their newly acquired public company to go after one of the most precious of the

precious metal prizes: the largest silver mine in America. Owning the nation’s biggest silver mine would be

like the crown on the Hunts’ silver empire. As a working mine, it was a productive asset in its own right.

What’s more, its estimated reserves of over 30,000,000 ounces would give the Hunts a base lode in the U.

S. to complement their stash in Europe. Finally, as the owners of an operating mine, they would qualify as

commercial users of silver and would thus be exempt from the trading restrictions applicable to futures

market speculators. Although that would later seem to be a most important benefit, it was a factor that the

Hunts did not consider at the time or so they said.

Located near Kellogg, Idaho, the Big Creek mine was owned by a publicly traded company called Sunshine

Mining. In the spring of 1977, Bunker and Herbert launched an attempt to take over Sunshine Mining

through Great Western. Sunshine’s management opposed the take-over, and a complicated flurry of

litigation ensued. When the dust settled, the Hunt brothers emerged with 28 percent of the stock for

$19,500,000 and a settlement agreement stipulating that they could acquire the rest of Sunshine’s stock at

no less than $15 a share, or about $60,000,000. Thus assured that the nation’s largest silver mine would

soon be theirs, the Hunt brothers installed a lieutenant, G. Michael Boswell, the former president of Great

Western United, by now renamed Hunt International Resources Corporation (HIRCO), as the new president

of Sunshine. Bunker and Herbert then turned to other things-such as figuring out how to buy more silver.

Given what was happening in the world and the ever-increasing price of gold, Bunker was now convinced

more than ever that the price of silver was destined to catch fire soon. Rather than ease his cash squeeze by

selling off his bullion (a move that would make him miss out on any upcoming price Increases), he set out

once again to find a silver buying partner.

This time, Bunker’s share of the Hunt luck came through he got some interest from the Saudis. What first

caught their attention was a letter Bunker sent to 50 wealthy Saudis in early 1978 explaining why he

believed silver was bound for a big increase in price. According to sources familiar with the deal in the Page 11 of 19

making, however, the actual Hunt-Saudi connection came not from the letter but from the hand of the

ubiquitous John Connally.

In February of 1978, just as he was gearing up for his Presidential race, Connally introduced Bunker to

Sheik Khaled Ben Mahfouz, a Connally client and business partner whose family contacts the National

Commercial Bank of Saudi Arabia in Jidda. Like most other wealthy Saudis, Mahfouz had connections to

the royal family, but he was not royalty himself. Rather, as a sheik, not a prince, he was one of that class of

Saudis who had risen to wealth at the’ pleasure and munificence of the king.

Connally and Mahfouz had established a symbiotic business relationship. Mahfouz had purchased an

interest in the Main Bank in Houston, an institution in which Connally happened to own a financial stake.

The man the sheik had purchased his interest from was Saudi wheeler-dealer Ghaith Pharaon. The

flamboyant Pharaon was Mahfouz’ friend and Connally’s client, but he was also the new owner of a stake

in Bert Lance’s National Bank of Georgia. Connally feared that even a remote association with Lance

would damage his Presidential hopes. Mahfouz bought out Pharaon’s interest in the Main Bank to save

embarrassment for Connally. About the same time, Connally acquired an interest in Mahfouz’ bank in

Saudi Arabia.

By bringing Bunker Hunt and Mahfouz together in the winter of 1978, Connally was performing one of his

most fabled functions, that of deal maker. The introductory meeting took place in Washington after Bunker

and Connally completed negotiations on a New Zealand deal the Hunts were in. No final commitment was

made at the meeting, but plans were made to explore the deal further.

Then, just about the time a deal with the Saudis finally seemed to be in the offing, trouble developed back

in Dallas. Ironically, part of the problem came from the fact that the price of silver finally began to move of

its own accord. Responding at last to inflation and increases in other precious metal prices, silver rose from

four dollars an ounce to six dollars an ounce by January 1979. Prices continued a slow but steady climb

toward the eight dollar mark through the spring and early summer.

Meanwhile, G. Michael Boswell and the other young Hunt lieutenants in Sunshine Mining’s management

turned hostile to the scheduled Hunt takeover. Boswell and his men based their opposition on both personal

and financial grounds. Complaining of heavy handed treatment by HIRCO’s managers, the Sunshine men

claimed that the $15 per share takeover price mentioned in the settlement agreement with the Hunts was a

floor, not a ceiling. Boswell and his group made it clear they thought the price for Sunshine was now too

low in light of the recent trends in silver prices. They wrote Sunshine shareholders a strongly worded letter

warning them, “Don’t Give Sunshine Away.”

To the Hunt brothers, the Boswell letter was an act of high treason. He was, after all, their fair-haired boy.

A bitter round of accusations and litigation followed, with the Hunts unleashing their private eyes to poke

into the private lives of Boswell and the other Sunshine boys. But Boswell’s warning had its intended effect

on Sunshine stockholders. After an unsuccessful tender offer, the Hunts finally dropped their takeover

attempt and sold their shares in Sunshine back to a management trust. A few weeks later, they bought up

the outstanding 40 percent of HIRCO still owned by the public and took the company private.

In losing Sunshine, the Hunts lost the great silver mine they had lusted for. But their most sensational silver

play was only beginning. In the summer of 1979, just after the dust settled from the shootout over Sunshine

Mining, Bunker and Herbert completed negotiations for their silver buying partnership with the Saudis. On

July first, the partners incorporated a Bermuda based trading company called International Metals

Investment Company, Ltd. The firm’s registration listed four principals: Nelson Bunker Hunt, William

Herbert Hunt, Sheik Mohammed Aboud Al-Amoudi and Sheik Ali Bin Mussalem. International Metals’

purpose was to invest in gold, platinum and, most of all, silver.

The participation of the two sheiks apparently resulted from Bunker’s Connally connection. Like their

mutual friend Mahfouz, both Al-Amoudi and Mussalem were nouveau riche Arabs from Jidda. Both men Page 12 of 19

had made their money in real estate when the late King Faisal parceled out some of the land in the kingdom

to allow sheiks outside the royal family to share in Saudi Arabia’s prosperity. Sources familiar with the two

sheiks indicate that Al-Amoudi was worth about $300,000,000, while Mussalem was worth about

$100,000,000. Although such wealth made them rich men by most standards, it hardly put them in a league

with the Hunts. What’s more, by investing in silver, Al-Amoudi and Mussalem were defying conventional

Saudi business wisdom, which held that investing in precious metals put petrodollars back in the hands of

the West.

The equalizer, according to several accounts, was the sheiks’ connection to the Saudi royal family. Known

by conservative Arab financial men as high fliers, the two sheiks were not among the king’s top advisors.

However, both Al-Amoudi and Mussalem did know fellow Jidda resident Prince Faisal ben Abdallah al

Saoud. Prince Faisal happened to be the son of Prince Abdallah, the commander of the Saudi National

Guard and a member of the kingdom’s ruling triumvirate. Like Bunker Hunt, Abdallah was a lover of fine

horses and a billionaire many times over. He could definitely afford to play in the same game with the

Hunts. But, like other highly placed Saudis, Abdallah did not like having his name openly connected with

business ventures, especially controversial ones. Although neither Abdallah’s nor Faisal’s name at any time

appeared on the registry of International Metals, several sources have suggested that they were the real

money behind Al-Amoudi and Mussalem.

The exact size of the International Metals Investment partnership is still secret, but, as subsequent events

would prove, it was large enough to buy over 90,000,000 ounces of silver bullion. At an average price of

ten dollars an ounce, such a hoard could be purchased (on margin) via silver futures contracts for an initial

cash outlay of some $45,000,000. But to take delivery on the bullion, as the partners intended to do, some

$900,000,000 in cash would be required. As 50-50 partners with the Saudis, Bunker and Herbert would be

responsible for putting up roughly $450,000,000.

How, given their cash squeeze, did the Hunts plan on coming up with that kind of money? The answer is

contained in the question. The Hunts had some money free from the sale of their Sunshine stock. More

important, they also had the 42,000,000 ounces’ worth of futures contracts they had been rolling forward

for the preceding several months. Those contracts settled daily. For every dollar an ounce increase, another

dollar an ounce was credited to the Hunts’ cash accounts. Since the price of silver had been rising slowly

but steadily since the first of the year, the Hunts were now building up sizable surpluses in their accounts.

The value of the 55,000,000 ounces of bullion the brothers had bought back in 1973 and 1974 was also

appreciating. With some 15,000,000 ounces of that bullion still stored in U. S. vaults, the Hunts also had

handy collateral for cash loans. In effect, they could use their silver to buy more silver, literally pyramiding

bars on top of bars.

Although the timing of their various loans is not clear as of this writing, it seems clear that the Hunt's

received loans both for buying silver and later, for paying off some of their debts. One loan was for

$40,000,000 and was made by a syndicate including the Bache Group, Continental Illinois Bank and the

Royal Bank of Canada. Another loan was for $233,000,000 and was made by the First National Bank of

Chicago, Irving Trust and eight other large banks. In addition, the New York branch of Swiss Bank lent the

Hunts $200,000,000 and Citibank lent $17,500,000. While the conditions of those loans have yet to be

made clear, they were apparently made in defiance of Federal Reserve Board chairman Paul Volckers

request that banks not make loans for commodity speculation.

The Hunts formed a new subsidiary for their International Metals Investment partnership, calling it,

appropriately enough, Profit Investment. They chose the name not only for the obvious meaning but also

because of a long-lasting family superstition that names beginning with the letter P and containing six

letters-names such as Placid and Penrod brought good luck.

The Hunt-Saudi silver buying began in mid-July, and began big. Working through both the Commodity

Exchange (Comex) in New York and the Chicago Board of Trade (C.B.O.T.), the group purchased some

8600 silver futures contracts, the equivalent of 43,000,000 ounces. All of the contracts were due for

delivery that fall. Page 13 of 19

About the time the Hunts and the Saudis started buying; several other big buyers entered the market, too.

One was Naji Robert Nahas, a Lebanese Arab living in Brazil who owned 23 multinational companies and

had made many millions speculating in coffee futures. Nahas and the other big purchasers were identified

only by corporate front names and addresses in Geneva and the Bahamas. Like Nahas, those mysterious

foreign buyers placed most of their buy orders through Conti Commodity Services; together, the Conti

group got into the market for another 42,000,000 ounces’ worth of silver futures contracts. Still other

foreign buyers, many of them Kuwaitis and Bahrainis, also got into silver on the European exchanges via a

company called Gulf Investment, which traded through the Arab consortium bank in Paris.

The identity of the new big buyers remained a secret through August and September, but what happened to

the price of silver did not. Having risen slowly but steadily all year, the price suddenly jumped from eight

dollars to over $16 in only two months’ time. Part of the price explosion was undoubtedly attributable to

the voracious demand of the big buyers. But, as the CFTC itself later observed, the demand was also con-

sistent with the worldwide demand for precious metals as a hedge against inflation and unstable politics.

Gold prices had already been surging upward for months. Silver had remained relatively under priced, but

was catching up. On October third, it closed at $17.88 per ounce.

Both the Comex and the C.B.O.T. flew into a panic. Trading frenzied then dried up as small investors

scrambled for cover amid rumors that the new big buyers included the Hunts. Exchange officials grew

increasingly anxious. The big buyers kept buying futures, but they also kept taking delivery as their old

contracts matured. The warehouses of the two exchanges held only 120,000,000 ounces of bullion, and that

amount was traded in the month of October alone. The Hunt-Saudi partnership itself took delivery on some

40,000,000 ounces. Combined with the Hunts’ earlier purchases, this gave the group ownership of 62 per-

cent of the stock in the Comex warehouse and 26 percent of the stock in the Board of Trade’s vaults.

International Metals also traded some of its futures for another 28,000,000 ounces of silver not held by the

U. S. exchanges’ vaults. Conditions looked ripe for a “squeeze”: that situation where there is simply not

enough bullion available to meet the strict delivery terms of the contracts.

At that point, the CFTC and the officials of the two exchanges decided to have a little talk with the Hunts.

Explaining that they feared a squeeze, the exchange officials asked them if they would consider selling

some of their silver. The brothers’ answer was no. What was more, they said, they intended to keep buying

silver and to keep taking delivery on it. They thought silver was still a good buy, even at the new high

prices. Besides, as Bunker put it with typical understatement. “If you sell, you get into a tax problem.”

On top of all that, Bunker really did believe in silver as a long-term investment, the underpinnings of a new

economy. He did not say that in so many words to the CFTC men and the exchange officials, but he did

give them a glimpse of his basic apocalyptic vision when he revealed a previously undisclosed feature of

his silver play: the fact that he was moving his metal to Europe. This time, he did not fly the bullion

overseas in chartered jets with cowboy guards. As he told the CFTC, Bunker simply traded 9,000,000

ounces’ worth of metal he held in Chicago and New York exchange warehouses for an equal amount of

bullion held by other traders in London and Zurich. The reason? As he explained to the CFTC and the

exchange officials, he feared that the U. S. Government might expropriate silver from Americans just as it

had expropriated gold back in the Thirties.

But Bunker’s assurances that he was willing to cooperate as much as possible apparently mollified the

CFTC officials; the C.B.O.T., however, concluded that it was time to act. In a move aimed directly at the

Hunts and the other big buyers, the Board of Trade raised the margin requirement and declared that silver

traders would be limited to 3,000,000 ounces of futures contracts. Traders with more than that would have

to divest themselves of their excess futures holdings by mid-February 1980.

With that, the battle lines were drawn. Bunker let it be publicly known that he thought the C.B.O.T. was

changing the rules in the middle of the game, and vowed to fight the limits all the way. Privately, he

regarded the C.B.O.T.’s action as another conspiracy against him by the Eastern establishment. And for

once, he had a good prima-facie case. Page 14 of 19

The boards of both the Chicago and the New York exchanges were composed not only of “outside”

directors but also of representatives of the major, usually Eastern-based brokerage houses. Later testimony

would reveal that nine of the 23 Comex board members held short contracts on 38,000,000 ounces of

silver. With their 1.88 billion dollar collective interest in having the price go down, it is easy to see why

Bunker did not view them as objective regulators. At the same time, though, the C.B.O.T. restrictions made

Bunker even more bullish on silver, because, as he put it, “they show a silver shortage exists.”

Bunker appeared to be right. Through November and December, the price of silver rose faster than ever. By

the last day of 1979, the price reached an astronomical $34.45 an ounce. Meanwhile, the Hunts’ silver

holdings kept increasing. By the end of December, the Hunts and their Arab partners held 90,300,000

ounces of bullion that the CFTC knew about and another 40,000,000 ounces the Hunts had stashed in

Europe. The Hunt group also held about 90,000,000 ounces worth of silver futures, most of them due for

delivery in March on the Comex in New York.

By this time, the CFTC became concerned that the silver positions held by the Hunts and the Conti group

were “too large relative to the size of the U. S. and world silver markets.” Subscribing to the philosophy

that the futures market was not a substitute for the cash market, the commission determined that the time

had come to stop Bunker’s perverse buying spree. A meeting to decide what to do was set for January 8,

1980.

Then the Comex stepped in. On January seventh, the exchange announced new position limits restricting

traders to no more than 10,000,000 ounces’ worth of futures contracts. The effective date of the limits was

set for February 18.

The day after the Comex announcement, the CFTC announced that it was backing the exchanges new

limits.

Bunker was incensed. “I am not a speculator. I am not a market squeezer,” he protested. “I am just an

investor and holder in silver.” Taking the offensive, he accused the exchanges and the Government of

destroying the U. S. silver market by changing the rules in the middle of the game. “The market will move

to Europe,” he predicted ominously. “The silver market in this country is a thing of the past.”

Strangely enough, the price of silver fell only one day in the wake of the Comex announcement, then

started climbing even higher. Part of the reason for the continued price spiral, according to an after-the-fact

analysis by the CFTC, was that Bunker kept buying silver. On January 14 and 16, the Hunts made

agreements to take future delivery on 32,500,000 ounces of silver (mostly in London) at various dates that

spring. The largest of those contracts were with Englehard Minerals. On January 17, silver hit a record high

of $50 an ounce.

Bunker could hardly be incensed about that. On that one day, the worth of the Hunts’ silver bullion

holdings was nearly four and a half billion dollars. Since most of that silver had been acquired at less than

ten dollars an ounce, they had a profit of over three and a half billion dollars. Bunker and Herbert had made

nearly as much money in the past six months as their late father had made in his entire lifetime, at least on

paper. Of course, if Bunker actually sold all that bullion, he would face enormous tax consequences. The

trick now was to figure a way to utilize those huge gains without having them decimated by the taxman.

As Bunker pondered that, the exchanges decided to impose their most stringent restriction yet. On January

21, the Comex announced that trading would be limited to liquidation orders only. There would be no more

futures buying. The game was closing down.

The next day, the price of silver plunged to $34, a drop of ten dollars in a single day. It stabilized shortly

after that, and remained in the mid to high 30s for the rest of the month. But in February, the price began to

slide downward again. By that time, silver was literally coming out of the woodwork. In response to the

new high prices, old ladies had been selling their tea sets. Families had been hocking their silverware. Coin Page 15 of 19

collectors had been divesting themselves of their collections. In January and February alone, an estimated

16,000,000 ounces of silver coins and an additional 6,000,000 ounces of scrap silver had come onto the

market. With the price of silver now dropping, some of those small sellers and small investors began

complaining to the CFTC about the exchange restrictions.

Bunker, meanwhile, remained as bullish as ever. “Why would anyone want to sell silver to get dollars?” he

asked in amazement. “I guess they got tired of polishing it.”

Prudently or not, Bunker practiced what he preached. In early February, the Hunts took delivery of

26,500,000 ounces of bullion from the Chicago exchange. That brought the brothers total group holdings

(including their partnership with the Arabs and their European silver stash) to slightly over 155,000,000

ounces. Instead of selling his futures, most of which were set for delivery in March, Bunker simply rolled

them forward into the months of May and September. He also bought a $4,250,000 stake in Goldfield, a

silver mining concern, and a six-and-a-half percent stake in his own silver broker, the Bache Group. In late

February, the Hunts made headlines in Dallas for an unusual precious-metals-based employee-benefits

package. The plan provided that Hunt employees could take their bonuses in silver, gold or cash, whichever

was highest at the time the benefits were paid out. That was not the act of a man who believed the price of

silver was going to crater.

Neither were the things Bunker was doing behind the scenes. In late February, with the price now hovering

in the low 30s, Bunker began another global search for a silver buying partner. Despite the recent price

slippages, the prospects looked good. The Kuwaitis and the Bahrainis in Gulf Investment had sold their

silver near the top of the market for an estimated $22,000,000 profit. Elated by their success, the group was

ready to get back in the market again. They proposed a new venture in partnership with Bunker to be called

Gulf Precious Metals. The intention of this new group was to raise another $500,000,000 to buy more

silver; of that total amount, Bunker would supply 10 to 20 percent.

There followed a series of meetings in Paris, the Persian Gulf States and Texas. One of the meetings took

place in Dallas on February 26. Among those in attendance were Mario Araktingi, a Greek Arab who

advises the Saudi royal family on investments; Mohammed Ishmael, a director of the Arab bank in Paris;

Sheik Mahfouz, the Saudi banker and Connally client; and the Hunt brothers, Bunker and Herbert. After the

gathering, the Arabs flew off to Bermuda, home base of International Metals, then turned around and went

hack to Dallas for another meeting with the Hunts.

Meanwhile, with the ready cash of Placid Oil, the Hunts were making several large nonmetal investments.

Placid bought the oil reserves of a company called Bodcaw for $190,000,000 in cash, and then purchased

$100,000,000 in stock in oil-rich Louisiana Land and Exploration Company. After that, Placid bought a 9.6

percent stake in coal-rich Gulf Resources and Chemical Corporation, and then announced a $350,000,000

tender offer for the rest of the stock. Gulf Resources’ board voted against the tender and the Hunts backed

off.

Then rumors circulated that the Hunts had an even more prodigious takeover target: Texaco. Like cornering

a modern market, taking over one of the Seven Sisters was almost too absurd for most people to think

about. By one estimate, taking over the whole company would have cost ten billion dollars at prevailing

market prices. Even the Hunts, with an estimated four billion dollars in paper profits in silver, would be

hard pressed to make that kind of play. But by that time, it seemed like anything was possible for the Texas

brothers. So, while the purchases of Texaco stock by Placid were never confirmed, the rumors continued to

circulate.

At the same time, the price of silver continued to drop. On March third, it was at $35.20 an ounce; but by

March 14, it was clown to $21. One reason for the price drop was the rapidly spiraling interest rate; that not

only strengthened the dollar but also raised the cost of buying on margin. Another reason was the fact that

at January’s $50 price, there were fewer and fewer people left who could afford to buy silver. Still another Page 16 of 19

reason was the fact that world tensions had eased a bit-and the flight into precious metals as a haven from

the apocalypse finally slowed.

For Bunker and his Arab partners, the continuing price drop spelled enormous trouble. It meant, for one

thing, that the value of their already delivered silver bullion was decreasing rapidly. At $21 an ounce, the

Hunts’ silver was worth nearly two billion dollars less than what it had been worth a few weeks before.

That meant so much less collateral available for new silver buying loans. Even worse, the declining prices

meant that the Hunts had to keep coming up with more cash margin money to maintain their futures

positions, which were in the 60,000,000-ounce range. By late March, their margin calls at Bache were in

excess of $10,000,000 per day.

Still confident that silver prices would turn upward again, Bunker refused to sell out. But despite his

optimism, prices continued to drop, and the margin calls continued to mount. Everything finally came to a

head on March 25, 1980. Bache called Dallas that afternoon to inform the Hunts of a $135,000,000’ margin

call. Herbert responded with a stunner:

“We can’t make it.”

The Bache people could hardly believe it. Had their biggest client reached the end of the rope? Still reeling

from the thought of it, the Bache men told Herbert they would have to begin liquidating the Hunts’

contracts. Herbert indicated that they should go ahead if that was ‘what was required.

The’ next day, Bache sold off $100,000,000 of Hunt bullion. It also contacted the CFTC. Bache told the

commission that the Hunts’ account carried equity of only $90,000,000 and that the brothers would

probably lose another $86,000,000 in the next day’s trading. Combined with other recent losses of

$40,000,000, that left a deficit in the Hunts’ account of some $36,000,000. More important as far as the rest

of the world was concerned, it was the kind of news that raised the specter of a full-scale financial disaster.

Word that the Hunts’ losses had imperiled the stability of a major brokerage house could drive the market

into a panic.

CFTC chairman James Stone sounded the alarm to the Government’s financial heads of state. A short time

later, fearing the worst, Stone, Volcker, SEC chairman Harold Williams and Deputy Treasury Secretary

Robert Carswell began a round-the-clock silver market monitoring session.

That same day, Bunker suddenly turned up in Paris. At eight P.M. Paris time, which was two P.M. in New

York, he released a remarkable announcement to the press via a Paris agency. His statement said that he

and four Arab partners had acquired “more than 200,000,000 ounces of silver” and that the group was

putting up its hoard to back the sale of silver bonds. The statement went on to say that the bonds would be

distributed through “big European banks” (though it did not name any) and promised that the bonds would

be in denominations of varying size, so as to attract small investors as well as large ones. Bunker’s

statement disclosed that his partners in the silver bonds venture were Prince Faisal bin Abdallah, Sheik Al-

Amoudi, Mahmoud Fustok (a Saudi contractor and advisor to the prince) and Naji Nahas, the Brazilian

Lebanese who had purchased silver with the Conti group.

The announcement carried a host of intriguing ramifications. On one level, it appeared that he had achieved

his dream: the creation of his own separate economy. Just as the governments of the world had issued

currencies by virtue of the metal they owned, Bunker and his Arab partners were now planning to issue

their own “real” money, even as the governments of the world were now issuing paper with no metal

behind it.

In reality, Bunker’s announcement carried a far more desperate message. The silver bonds arrangements

were obviously incomplete, or he would have been able to name the banks involved. With silver prices

dropping and a personal financial debacle in the offing, Bunker was apparently making a last ditch

confirmation of the fact that he was still bullish on silver. Page 17 of 19

The next day, Thursday, March 27, the silver market collapsed. The price of silver opened that day at

$15.80 per ounce. Then rumors started circulating that the Hunts had a one billion dollar margin call and

they were not going to be able to meet it. Subsequent rumors said that Bache was on the verge of going

under. The price of silver plummeted to 10.80 an ounce. The debacle spilled over into the stock market on

the strength of an additional rumor that the Hunts were selling off huge stock shares in Louisiana Land.

Gulf Resources and Texaco. The Dow Jones average dropped a staggering 25.43 points, hitting its lowest

level in five years. It looked to many like the sky was falling.

About that time, a second wave of rumors hit the streets. The Hunts would be able to meet their margin

call, after all. The price of silver remained at its $10.80 level, but the stock market rallied incredibly.

Bargain hunters and other buyers brought the Dow-Jones back up to only 2.14 points below the level at

which it had begun the day.

Shock waves from the silver crash reverberated around the world. For the little guy, there was reason for

rejoicing:

The break in silver prices was one of the first big price downturns in a long time. For investors who had

gone short on silver, it was a time for raking in big profits. Armand Hammer, chairman of Occidental

Petroleum, for one, reported a gain of $119,000,000 in silver’s slump. For investors who had followed the

Hunts, there was reason for jumping out of windows: They lost millions that they could afford to part with

far less easily than could Bunker and Herbert. But even for those who had remained on the sidelines, there

was reason for grave concern. There had not been a day like Black Thursday since the Great Depression.

As the world press tried frantically to reach him, Bunker made himself unavailable for comment. Shortly

after making his silver bonds announcement, he left Paris on a plane to Saudi Arabia to consult with his

Arab partners. Having been billions ahead, he was now staring at billions in losses. The only thing he said

before taking off was, “It’ll all come out in the wash.”

Bunker’s prediction turned out to be more accurate than he might have wished. Instead of repeating Black

Thursday’s debacle, silver prices rallied to $12 an ounce the next day. But Bunker and Herbert Hunt found

themselves with some of the biggest losses in U. S. financial history. Since January, the value of their silver

bullion had depreciated by nearly four billion dollars. Because most of that silver had been purchased at

under ten dollars an ounce, they were actually still a little bit ahead on their bullion purchases. But they had

taken a tremendous beating in the futures market and on silver contracts they had purchased when prices

were in the $35 an ounce range. The exact extent of the Hunts’ troubles was hard even for them to

determine, but it quickly became clear that their outstanding debts were in the one and a half billion dollar

range, including a $665,000,000 delivery contract with Englehard that they could not meet.

With much of their holdings pledged as collateral on loans that, in turn, had been used to buy silver, the

Hunts and their bankers were in a double bind. The more the price went down, the more they owed, and the

less their original collateral their silver was worth.

On the Sunday following Black Thursday, Bunker flew in from Saudi Arabia to meet with Herbert and the

Englehard people in Dallas. Since Bunker was fatigued, Herbert did most of the talking, and most of what

Herbert had to say sounded pretty grim. Among other things, he informed the Englehard men that the entire

Hunts’ silver was already pledged as collateral on loans, or, as he put it, was “all under water.” Such a

predicament might have seriously upset other mortals, but not Bunker Hunt. Confronted with his

multibillion-dollar troubles, he simply observed, “a billion dollars isn’t what it used to be.”

Despite their ability to remain calm, the Hunts did not succeed in working out a deal with Englehard in

Dallas. So that afternoon, they and the Englehard men flew to Boca Raton, Florida, where the heads of the

nation’s largest banks had gathered for a meeting of the Federal Reserve City Bankers Association. Volcker

happened to be in town to give a speech to the association, and upon hearing of the Hunt Englehard Page 18 of 19

problem, allowed that he had no objection to their trying to negotiate a loan, despite his earlier disapproval

of lending for commodity speculation purposes.

Through the night and into the wee hours of the morning, the Hunts and the Englehard men negotiated with

the bankers. Volcker sat in on some of the talks and, at one point, even appeared with a shirt over his

pajama top to check on the status of the negotiations. But even under the benign gaze of the Federal

Reserve Board chairman, the bankers could not come to terms with the Hunts. The brothers’ maze of debts,

commitments and interlocking collateral was just too complicated. As one participant put it, “There were

just too many loose ends.”

Nevertheless, by the time the sun rose, the Hunts and Englehard had managed to reach an accommodation.

Under the terms of the deal, the Hunts agreed to give Englehard 8,500,000 ounces of silver and a 20

percent interest in their Canadian oil properties in the Beaufort Sea. Although carried on the books as worth

about $275,000,000, the Beaufort Sea properties have a potential worth estimated at $600,000,000 to

$750,000,000. But the wells there have yet to come on production and it may be years before they do. At

this point, the Hunts just don’t know how much their deal with Englehard will cost them.

With the completion of the Englehard agreement, negotiations for a loan to the Hunts picked up again.

Fearing that the Hunts’ inability to pay their silver debts might cause more major tremors in the nation’s

financial system, Fed chairman Volcker gave his tacit approval to a plan to bail the brothers out. Under the

terms of the deal, a consortium of banks, including First National Bank of Dallas and Morgan Guaranty of

New York, has agreed to lend 1.1 billion dollars to a partnership composed of the Hunt brothers and Placid

Oil, the most viable entity under the Hunt family corporate umbrella. The partnership, in turn, will use the

money to pay off the Hunt brothers silver debts.

The Hunts’ loan does not come cheap. As collateral, Placid has mortgaged substantially all of its oil and

gas properties in Louisiana and the Gulf of Mexico; those properties make up roughly one half of the

company’s six billion dollars in assets. In addition, Bunker and Herbert have contributed collateral in the

form of 63,000,000 ounces of silver bullion and coal properties worth an estimated $480,000,000. They

have also agreed not to speculate in the silver market until the 63,000,000 ounces of silver they have

contributed to the partnership have been sold off.

On top of all that, Bunker and Herbert have also had to make some costly internal family financing

arrangements. Fearing that Placid, the family jewel, might be left holding the bag if silver prices declined

further, the Hunt sisters insisted that the boys put up even more of their own property to secure Plaid’s

interest in the silver partnership. Along with their brother Lamar (who participated in the silver deal to a

much lesser extent than his brothers), Bunker and Herbert have mortgaged their racehorses. furs, fine

paintings, coin collections, jewelry and cars, as well as more oil and real estate properties. The bottorn line

is that in trying to prove themselves even greater moneymakers than their late father, the Hunt brothers

have ended up putting the better part of the family empire in hock.

At this writing, the future of both Nelson Bunker Hunt and the silver market remains very much lip in the

air. Many analysts believe that at $12 - $14 an ounce, silver is now drastically under priced. While prices

may not shoot through the $50 an ounce mark again any time soon, there is a good possibility they could

climb hack up to the $20 - $25 range. If that happens, the Hunts could easily pay off their silver debts and

even wind up with some tidy profits.

On the other hand, if silver languishes or drops even lower, the Hunts could lose hundreds of millions

more. In addition to worrying about the price, they have to pay interest on their 1.1 billion dollar loan at the

rate of $500,000 per day, which works out to more than $180,000,000 per year. The Hunts also have to deal

with a market that knows they must sell. Even if silver is going up in the long run, that selling will

inevitably drive the price downward in the short term, and the market appears to he waiting for that to

happen. Finally, the Hunts may well have to cope with even more silver than what they have put into the

partnership with Placid. They claim that they have only 63,000,000 ounces left. But their huge purchases in 1973 and 1974 seem to have been lost in the calculations. The brothers may actually hold another

40,000,000 ounces of silver in their European stash. But as long as prices remain depressed, that extra sort

does them little good.

Whether or not these dark clouds turn out to have a silver lining, it is more than likely that the brothers will

be able to pay off their debts one way or another. The sheer size of their non silver holdings makes

bankruptcy a most remote possibility. For Bunker, the worst part of all this is not his losses but the

increasing amount of public disclosure and Government inquiry the Hunts have been subjected to in order

to pay off their debts. According to his friends, the stress of these developments has caused Bunker’s legs

to sweat and even made him lose a little weight.

Yet, as one associate says, “For a man who has just lost billions, he looks remarkably calm but then, he’s

like that.” Down but far from out, Bunker remains bullish on silver. He fully expects that prices will rise

and that his financial situation will take care of itself. He also believes he may have grounds for a lawsuit

against the commodities exchanges for changing the silver buying rules. As he put it in a recent appearance

before a Congressional investigating committee, “The game is not over.”

The people who know Bunker Hunt best don’t doubt that for a minute.